Global warming scam Tuesday. Here’s a good rebuttal to the NCADAC Climate Assessment Report, which is just a rehash of their last one. Fail.
Date: March 4, 2013
Subject: Upcoming NCADAC Climate Assessment Report
From: Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations
To: Lead Authors of NCADAC Report
Dear Lead Authors:
The draft of your upcoming NCADAC Climate Assessment Report was recently released for comment. Thank you for the time, effort and taxpayer dollars you’ve expended preparing that document. Unfortunately, in many parts, it appears simply to be a rehashing of your previous reports. And it contains numerous problems and inconsistencies.
MODEL-BASED SPECULATION IS CONTRADICTED BY DECADES OF DATA-BASED RESEARCH
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, NOAA created educational webpages that explained how weather patterns were linked to El Niños and La Niñas. They were supported by decades of data-based research, including Newell and Weare (1976) Factors Governing Tropospheric Mean Temperature, Angell (1981) Comparison of Variations in Atmospheric Quantities with Sea Surface Temperature Variations in the Equatorial Eastern Pacific, Pan and Oort…
View original post 5,301 more words