…because I might miss the first 29 times, not likely, but not everyone can’t shoot as well as I can. Or, there’s more than one asshole I have to shoot. Or, the first 29 didn’t stop the crazy asshole that just came through my door. Pick one. Any one of those, or whatever. When you liberal douche bags outlaw guns, you just made millions outlaws. Good luck with that.
I will not surrender my freedom to any douche bag politician, or his lick spittle cronies, because it scares them. Come try and get mine. They’ll be stacking you fuckers like cord wood.
Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
By William A. Levinson
Senator Dianne Feinstein’s latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.
Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight’s four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor, and
(2) Multiple aggressors
Failure to Stop
The classic .38 caliber revolver, with a capacity of six rounds, was the standard sidearm of the United States Army during the Moro insurrection in the Philippines. The Army found at least one dead Army officer with an empty sidearm, and his head split open by a machete or similar weapon. They also found the soldier’s killer, who had finally bled to death. Six rounds of .38 were therefore not enough to convince even one determined attacker.
Truth, Lies and In Between 
Because a 10 round magazine just won’t do.
Nope. Not even close.