…into the Cyber Security Bill that is in the Senate right now.

These assholes want to limit high capacity magazines and only allow 10 round magazines. This will NOT stop any violence that some deranged asshole might do to others, it’s just the same feel good bullshit that the Democrats are famous for. It’s illogical, but it really, really makes them feel good to CONTROL the masses. It’s always about the CONTROL. If the Democrats can’t CONTROL you and the rest of America, then they just don’t feel good about America.

Ever heard of creeping incrementalism?

Write your Senator, especially if they’re a Democrat douche bag and tell them to fuck off when it comes to gun CONTROL of any kind. They do NOT have a mandate for this.

In fact, all these assholes that vote for this need to hear it from you by being fired in the next election, even if it’s your asshole, which is the point of this. Only you can fire the asshole that supposedly represents you. Unless you live in Kalifornia. That’s a lost cause.

Democratic senators have offered an amendment to the cybersecurity bill that would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines for some consumers.

Shortly after the Cybersecurity Act gained Senate approval to proceed to filing proposed amendments and a vote next week, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a sponsor of the gun control amendment, came to the floor to defend the idea of implementing some “reasonable” gun control measures.

The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition.

More

Comments
  1. More bullshit from the usual suspects. What is it about control that so motivates people like Schumer et al? Attention whores one and all.