Obama usurpation of the US Constitution should in and of itself be grounds for impeachment. He spouts off about the “rule of law” yet he rides roughshod over it constantly.
His latest violation of US law being the Executive Order effectively bypassing Congress is probably the most obvious, and by itself is enough in my opinion for impeachment.
Who in their right mind would want to re-elect this asshole when he is clearly doing everything he can to fundamentally change America without the consent of the people, and in complete violation of the laws that he swore an oath to protect and defend?
You have got to be a mental moron to vote for this guy.
I’ll excuse your stupidity the first time around because you needed to show all your libtard friends how much you’re not a racist. Sorry, you failed that one too, it just shows you really are racist like the rest of the Democrat Party.
Here’s a great read:
By Andrew C. McCarthy
In continuing the dramatic shift from American constitutional democracy to rule by executive fiat that has marked his tenure, President Barack Obama now claims that the illegal aliens, to whom he purports to grant what effectively is amnesty, are “Americans … in every single way but one — on paper.” That is false. They are not Americans under the only thing that matters, the thing the Obama administration has chanted like a mantra — while riding roughshod over – since its very first day in power: the rule of law.
The Constitution and congressional statutes are written on parchment. That is the only relevance of “paper” in this equation — as the “hard copy” of our social contract and of the laws enacted pursuant to it. Under the Constitution, Congress, not the president, is endowed with such a power: “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.” Congress exercises this power by passing laws. Under the Constitution, which Obama took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend, and under the laws it is his duty to execute faithfully, illegal aliens — no matter how sympathetic their plight, no matter how blameless they may be for the illegality of their status — are not citizens of the United States. They are not Americans. Period. It is not “paper” that separates them from our body politic, it is the law, of which Obama is supposed to be servant, not master — as I argued in this September 2011 essay for The New Criterion: “The Ruler of Law — On ‘Justice’ in the Age of Obama.”
Nevertheless, immigration is only the context of the president’s latest usurpation. It is a critically important issue, yes, but the real gravity of what Obama has done lies not in the subject matter of his edict but in the authoritarian assumptions of its issuance. They transcend mere arrogance: the president proposes to eviscerate our constitutional system. He claims nothing less than the dictatorial power to pronounce what the law is. This usurpation, moreover, complements the dictatorial powers he has already claimed to enforce only the laws of his choosing and to use the police powers of his office to deprive the sovereign states and the people of their constitutional prerogatives and rights.
More
Required reading:
Obama’s Amnesty and Affirmative Action
America’s First Anarchist President
Like this:
Like Loading...
Truth, Lies and In Between 