How’s that global warming alarmism working out for you? Not so well you say?
So does NASA…

New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hold (sic) In Global Warming Alarmism

NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.


This global warming farce needs to come to a quick and final end. It’s bullshit, it’s been shown to be bullshit by many sources. Take you global warming lies and shove them straight up your ass.

  1. David says:

    Because one new study says they disagree, and because you agree with them, then it must be right.

    • 1idvet says:

      Global warming is bullshit.

      One asshole (Algore) says it exists and according to you, it must be right. Nice try, but science is on my side on this one.

  2. jon says:

    First, it was nothing close to being peer reviewed – it was published at”MDPI Open Access” – the youtube of journals.

    Second, here is the line by line complete debunking of the so called ‘study’…spencers-folly/…encers-folly-2/…encers-folly-3/

    Second, this is where the ‘research’ is coming from.

    James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate News.

    The Heartland Institute is a libertarian American public policy think tank based in Chicago, Illinois which advocates free market policies.

    The Heartland Institute questions the scientific consensus on climate change, arguing that global warming is not occurring and, further, that warming would be beneficial if it did occur.

    In the 1990s, the Heartland Institute worked with Philip Morris to question the link between secondhand smoke and health risks

    MediaTransparency reported that the Heartland Institute received funding from politically conservative foundations such as the Castle Rock Foundation, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.

    Oil and gas companies have contributed to the Heartland Institute, including over $600,000 from ExxonMobil between 1998 and 2005.

    The Independent reported that Heartland’s receipt of donations from Exxon and Philip Morris indicates a “direct link”…”between anti-global warming sceptics funded by the oil industry and the opponents of the scientific evidence showing that passive smoking can damage people’s health.”

    About the so called scientist

    Roy W. Spencer

    Spencer is a signatory of the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation’s “An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming”.

    The declaration states:

    “We believe Earth and its ecosystems — created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence — are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth’s climate system is no exception.”

    Spencer is a proponent of intelligent design as the mechanism for the origin of species.