Winners and Losers in the Fiscal 2013 Defense Budget… Monday, Apr 2 2012 

In case you were wondering, here’s the 2013 defense budget in a nut shell.

Winners and losers in the fiscal 2013 budget

By Barry Rosenberg

Mar 29, 2012

It’s been several weeks since the release of the fiscal 2013 defense budget, and heads are certainly still spinning in the Pentagon: Ground Mobile Radio (GMR) gone, Global Hawk Block 30 gone and the Army’s medium-altitude intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance program, the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System (EMARSS), also gone. There’s blood on the floor in the chief-of-staff/commandant offices at the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marines. Yet there’s still plenty of good news for all, with the funding flow to improve network operations still very much in evidence.

Here are some of the winners and losers at each of the services:

Army: The Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) continues to be the “cornerstone tactical communications system” for the service. Funding in fiscal 2013 is $900 million, and totals $6.1 billion from fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2017. Fiscal 2013 funding is earmarked for the purchase of net-centric warfare IP modems and low-rate initial production quantities to support test activities.

There also is funding for something we’ve been writing a lot about in Defense Systems: the modification of Stryker vehicles to incorporate command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems to facilitate mission command-on-the-move.

via Winners and losers in the fiscal 2013 budget — Defense Systems.

The Real Face Of American Servicemen And Women…. Thursday, Mar 29 2012 

This is a must read. You won’t see it, or hear of it in the MSM. Doesn’t fit the narrative.

The Real Face Of American Servicemen And Women Spc. Dennis Weichel

While the media focuses on the case of Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, it is worth remembering that he is the overwhelming exception.

Spc. Dennis Weichel of the Rhode Island National Guard is far more representative of the selfless sacrifice and honor exhibited by the US military during 2 wars and over 10 years of fighting. But even within the ranks of heroic actions, Spc. Weichel’s sacrifice stands out.

The official Pentagon news release says he died “from injuries suffered in a noncombat related incident.” But there is much more to the story. Weichel, 29, of Providence, died saving the life of a little girl.

According to the Rhode Island National Guard and the U.S. Army, Weichel was in a convoy a week ago with his unit in Laghman Province, in northeast Afghanistan. Some children were in the road in front of the convoy, and Weichel and other troops got out to move them out of the way.

Most of the children moved, but one little girl went back to pick up some brass shell casings in the road. Afghan civilians often recycle the casings, and the girl appeared to aim to do that. But a Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected vehicle was moving toward her, according to Lt. Col. Denis Riel of the Rhode Island National Guard.

MRAPs, as they are known, usually weigh more than 16 tons.

Weichel saw the massive truck bearing down on the girl and grabbed her out of the way. But in the process, the armored truck ran him over, Riel said.

The little girl is fine. Weichel died a short time later of his injuries.

Specialist Weichel leaves behind his fiance and three children.

via The Real Face Of American Servicemen And Women Spc. Dennis Weichel.

Crazy Combat Vets (NOT)… Monday, Mar 19 2012 

I really get pissed off when I see this shit. I see it all the time. A lot of the shows on TV have that theme in them. Some veteran loses his mind and kills innocent civilians.

The media spins the story that it’s a crazy combat veteran that has done something to society in general, even when they are wrong, and then don’t correct the story, which now makes their story a lie.

Yet, the incidents of crime committed by veterans is statistically insignificant in comparison with the general population.

Here’s a good article discussing this from War On Terror News

What to do about those “Crazed Combat Vets?”

In the first quarter of 2012, the media has publicized an Iraq Veteran killing a Park Ranger in Washington, an Orange County Deputy killing a Marine, an Army Private being stabbed to death by Meth Heads in Washington, and a Staff Sergeant that allegedly killed 16 Afghans in their sleep, along with so many other stories of Violent Veterans. The media is quick to tell us that these are Combat Veterans, but often fail to tell us when the person was tossed out of the military, like in that first case listed, or correct the story when they weren’t in Combat at all, or weren’t in the military as they had claimed.

In 2008, the NYTimes was on the same hunt, to prove that “Crazed” Combat Veterans were slaughtering American Civilians. They wrote about 121 cases in which someone died. The problem was that in many of those the Veteran was found to be innocent or to have acted in self-defense, while in others the trial had not occurred, and in many it was not murder at all. In those latter cases, it was often a car accident, that helped to boost their body count. When it was all said and done, the numbers demonstrated it was safer to be near a Combat Veteran than to be in the safest big city in America.

But “one is too many.”

One case of domestic violence, one murder, or one suicide is “too many.” Yeah, that sounds good, but short of locking every American up in solitary confinement, there is NO program that can end all violence in this Nation, any subsection of it, or in any other country.

via What to do about those “Crazed Combat Vets?” – War On Terror News.

Letter From My Congressman… Thursday, Mar 8 2012 

Just received this from my Congressman Buck McKeon…

Dear Friends,

As the representative of California’s 25th District, my top priority is keeping jobs in our community and getting people back to work. As Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, I take my job of protecting our service men, women and their families very seriously. We are at a critical moment in time, where both of my top priorities share a common threat: President Obama’s continued pursuit of defense cuts.

Last week, the President sent us his budget for 2013. This budget included $45 billion less for the Department of Defense than his request from last year. This continued slashing is on top of the already $487 billion in automatic cuts included in the Budget Control Act. It also threatens to increase healthcare fees (TRICARE) for our men and women in uniform, military families and veterans (The White House).

The defense of our country accounts for 20% of our federal budget, however 50% of our overall spending cuts are now being forced on the backs of our service men and women. (Budget Control Act)

What the President is proposing is catastrophic. The President is seeking to hollow out the greatest world power, leaving our military with fewer and fewer resources when we face increasingly hostile threats from across the globe. At a time when we are seeing violence and hostility in North Korea, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and other major hot spots, the President is seeking to shrink our military to some of the smallest levels we have seen since World War II.

These devastating cuts don’t just threaten our military. President Obama and advocates of these continued defense cuts fail to grasp the danger that these cuts pose to not only the security of our nation, but our economy. Not only does this drastically impact our armed service members, but it threatens thousands of jobs right here in our district.

This really impacts us in California, because we have one of the largest defense and aerospace sectors in the country. It is right here in our district where companies are creating the tools needed for our troops to have a definitive advantage in our national security interests. If these mandated automatic spending cuts are to take place, it is estimated that here in California alone we are set to lose 126,000 private sector jobs, 20,000 active duty military jobs and over 15,000 civilian DOD jobs. We are set to see an $11 billion decrease in our state’s GDP and our small businesses would lose more than $400 million in revenue. (http://www.aia-aerospace.org/)

I will not accept this continuous hit on our armed forces and American jobs. That is why I have introduced H.R. 3662, The Down Payment to Protect National Security Act, which would prevent a further round of cuts, beyond the $487 billion already announced by the President, from hitting our military and our communities.

Drastic cuts will hurt many communities in our district, like at Plant 42, Edwards Air Force Base, and China Lake, which account for over $1.4 billion in defense contracts in the Antelope Valley. Service chiefs and secretaries have testified before my committee that if these cuts are to take place, all of those contracts could be cut across the board by 8-12%. These institutions alone employ 25,000 people in the Antelope Valley and have payrolls of almost $1.5 billion, not to mention the many other related businesses that employ thousands of people in our community. As they deal with the uncertainty, they can’t plan for the future and many are already freezing hiring or planning layoffs. (http://www.aia-aerospace.org/)

As Chairman, I will fight against the drastic threats to our national defense proposed by the President. I will fight against the dangerous hollowing out of America’s Armed Forces. I will fight to keep our jobs here in California’s 25th district.

Recently, I appeared on several news shows to spread the word about this threat and its impact on our national security and jobs:

 

For some reason I am having difficulty getting the second video to post in here, so here’s the link: YouTube

Captain Carroll “Lex” LeFon (USN, Ret)…RIP Thursday, Mar 8 2012 

I reblogged this yesterday from My Blog, but felt that it needed more. Neptunus Lex was one of the first Milblogs that I stumbled onto and was a daily read for years. He will be sorely missed. His writing was exemplary.

Here’s Ace’s take on the loss of Lex.

Captain Carroll “Lex” LeFon (USN, Ret)…RIP

It’s a strange world we live in where we are friends with people we’ve never met. That’s the beauty of this internet thing of ours. The tragic part is when we lose one of the friends we haven’t really met but we known them, or at least the part of them they choose to share with us.

While we are still stunned at the loss of Andrew Breitbart, many of us follow the world through the eyes of milbloggers have lost another friend, Lex of Neptunus Lex. It wasn’t the random and almost unfathomable loss of a man in his prime passing on his way home but rather an ever present possible outcome for a man who slipped into a fighter jet and took the skies.

via Captain Carroll “Lex” LeFon (USN, Ret)…RIP.

Shit Civilians Say to Veterans… Tuesday, Mar 6 2012 

Here’s a video that’s gone viral.
I can see why. Don’t know how many times I’ve been asked stupid shit by civilians about my combat experience, or Army life in general.
Funny stuff here.

Obama is Trashing Tricare… Tuesday, Feb 28 2012 

And once again, the asshole in the White House wants to put the problems of America on the backs of the military. Specifically, on the backs of the active military,  retirees and their families.

They’ve already sacrificed for this nation, now that they are done with that, the government can screw them over.

We’re not a commodity anymore. Just a liability.

Thanks for your service asshole, now get on Obamacare and like it.

Trashing Tricare
Obama to cut healthcare benefits for active duty and retired US military

The Obama administration’s proposed defense budget calls for military families and retirees to pay sharply more for their healthcare, while leaving unionized civilian defense workers’ benefits untouched. The proposal is causing a major rift within the Pentagon, according to U.S. officials. Several congressional aides suggested the move is designed to increase the enrollment in Obamacare’s state-run insurance exchanges.

The disparity in treatment between civilian and uniformed personnel is causing a backlash within the military that could undermine recruitment and retention.

The proposed increases in health care payments by service members, which must be approved by Congress, are part of the Pentagon’s $487 billion cut in spending. It seeks to save $1.8 billion from the Tricare medical system in the fiscal 2013 budget, and $12.9 billion by 2017.

Many in Congress are opposing the proposed changes, which would require the passage of new legislation before being put in place.

“We shouldn’t ask our military to pay our bills when we aren’t willing to impose a similar hardship on the rest of the population,” Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and a Republican from California, said in a statement to the Washington Free Beacon. “We can’t keep asking those who have given so much to give that much more.”

Administration officials told Congress that one goal of the increased fees is to force military retirees to reduce their involvement in Tricare and eventually opt out of the program in favor of alternatives established by the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

via Trashing Tricare | Washington Free Beacon.

Military Retirees Get Screwed… Friday, Feb 24 2012 

They can’t balance a budget. They slash the military’s budget. They go after the retirees to pay for the things that they were promised would be there after they did their 20 years, or better. It’s bad enough that they want to hike fees, but to do it by as much as 78% is criminal.

The Veterans did what was asked, now the government reneges on the deal. Typical.

From the Army Times:

Tricare costs would jump in budget plan
By Patricia Kime – Staff writer

Pentagon officials will continue pressing in 2013 for significantly higher Tricare fees for military retirees, including older retirees covered by Tricare for Life, as well as higher drug co-pays for all Tricare beneficiaries.

The Defense Department’s proposed 2013 budget calls for annual enrollment fees for retirees in Tricare Prime to rise next year by 30 percent to 78 percent, from the current $460 or $520 for families to between $600 and $820, depending on military retirement income.

“Working-age retirees” — those younger than 65 — also would pay annual enrollment fees for Tricare Standard and Extra: $70 for an individual and $140 for a family. These would be the first enrollment fees for Standard and Extra in Tricare history.

Deductibles for Standard and Extra also would rise by $10 for individuals and $20 for families.

via Tricare costs would jump in budget plan – Army News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq – Army Times.

Today in Military History (February 23)… Thursday, Feb 23 2012 

Couple things of note for today.

The Marines’ iconic photo was taken today on Iwo Jima in 1945.

More on Iwo Jima.

Also today, Col. William B. Travis, commander of the Alamo, rejects a Mexican ultimatum to abandon the fort by firing a cannonball in the general direction of the enemy army, thus opening a 13-day siege.

Here’s a good sight to read up on that battle:

The Alamo

Originally named Misión San Antonio de Valero, the Alamo served as home to missionaries and their Indian converts for nearly seventy years. Construction began on the present site in 1724. In 1793, Spanish officials secularized San Antonio’s five missions and distributed their lands to the remaining Indian residents. These men and women continued to farm the fields, once the mission’s but now their own, and participated in the growing community of San Antonio.

In the early 1800s, the Spanish military stationed a cavalry unit at the former mission. The soldiers referred to the old mission as the Alamo (the Spanish word for “cottonwood”) in honor of their hometown Alamo de Parras, Coahuila. The post’s commander established the first recorded hospital in Texas in the Long Barrack. The Alamo was home to both Revolutionaries and Royalists during Mexico’s ten-year struggle for independence. The military — Spanish, Rebel, and then Mexican — continued to occupy the Alamo until the Texas Revolution.

San Antonio and the Alamo played a critical role in the Texas Revolution. In December 1835, Ben Milam led Texian and Tejano volunteers against Mexican troops quartered in the city. After five days of house-to-house fighting, they forced General Martín Perfecto de Cós and his soldiers to surrender. The victorious volunteers then occupied the Alamo — already fortified prior to the battle by Cós’ men — and strengthened its defenses.

On February 23, 1836, the arrival of General Antonio López de Santa Anna’s army outside San Antonio nearly caught them by surprise. Undaunted, the Texians and Tejanos prepared to defend the Alamo together. The defenders held out for 13 days against Santa Anna’s army. William B. Travis, the commander of the Alamo sent forth couriers carrying pleas for help to communities in Texas. On the eighth day of the siege, a band of 32 volunteers from Gonzales arrived, bringing the number of defenders to nearly two hundred. Legend holds that with the possibility of additional help fading, Colonel Travis drew a line on the ground and asked any man willing to stay and fight to step over — all except one did. As the defenders saw it, the Alamo was the key to the defense of Texas, and they were ready to give their lives rather than surrender their position to General Santa Anna. Among the Alamo’s garrison were Jim Bowie, renowned knife fighter, and David Crockett, famed frontiersman and former congressman from Tennessee.

The final assault came before daybreak on the morning of March 6, 1836, as columns of Mexican soldiers emerged from the predawn darkness and headed for the Alamo’s walls. Cannon and small arms fire from inside the Alamo beat back several attacks. Regrouping, the Mexicans scaled the walls and rushed into the compound. Once inside, they turned a captured cannon on the Long Barrack and church, blasting open the barricaded doors. The desperate struggle continued until the defenders were overwhelmed. By sunrise, the battle had ended and Santa Anna entered the Alamo compound to survey the scene of his victory.

More

Female Military Pioneer Running for Congress… Thursday, Feb 23 2012 

She’s running for Gabriel Giffords’ seat. I hope she gets it. Arizona needs a good conservative and they’d get a military pioneer in the process. She’s pro-Second Amendment, wants to secure the border, reduce the debt, believes in states’ rights, and places a high priority on national defense.

Female Military Pioneer Running for Congress
By Elise Cooper

Colonel Martha McSally, a Republican candidate running for Gabby Giffords’ former congressional seat, has an interesting and highly decorated past. In January 1995, she became the first woman in U.S. history to fly a combat aircraft into enemy territory when she flew her initial mission into Iraq to help enforce the United Nations’ “no-fly zone.” She was part of the team that helped plan and execute the U.S. air operations over Afghanistan shortly after 9/11.

In July 2004, McSally took command of the 354th Fighter Squadron, becoming the first woman in U.S. history to command a combat aviation unit. While defending her country she has received numerous honors, including being recognized by the University of Arizona and “Women Who Lead,” in addition to receiving the Tucson YWCA Women on the Move Award and the Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Center on Women in Policing. American Thinker interviewed her about her fascinating career and why she decided to run for the seat previously held by Congresswoman Giffords.

Her no-nonsense attitude came across loud and clear while she described her uphill battle with the Pentagon. In 1995, McSally became aware of the U.S. military policy requiring U.S. servicewomen stationed in Saudi Arabia to wear the Muslim garment called an abaya, a black head-to-toe robe that signifies women’s subordination to men. They had to wear it over their uniform while on duty as well as off duty. In 2000, it became personal when McSally was deployed to Saudi Arabia and was told that either she must submit to it or be charged with insubordination.

via Articles: Female Military Pioneer Running for Congress.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers