Death to America? Wild Bill for America Wednesday, May 2 2012 

Axis of Idiots and Buyers' Remorse and Comarade Obama and Islam and Muslims and Obama and SCOAMF and Terrorism , , , , , , 1IDVET 13:13

Reblogged from Boudica BPI Weblog:

  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

Why are we sending money to the “Death to America” crowd?

Follow us, donate and help us stay on-line.

This is worthy of your time. Stop foreign aid now!

 

Another Reason why California is Boned… Tuesday, Jan 10 2012 

Axis of Idiots and Democrats and Economics and Failure and Government and Neo-Marxists and Socialism and Stupid People and Unions and WTF Files , , , , , , , , , , 1IDVET 10:33

This is why California is boned. Yeah, let’s keep adding to the debt. Makes perfect sense to me. Oh, and let’s raise the taxes again! And let’s give more free shit to illegal aliens too! That will solve everything.

Berkeley city manager not unique retiring with bigger pension than salary – ContraCostaTimes.com

Daniel Borenstein: Berkeley city manager not unique retiring with bigger pension than salaryBy Daniel BorensteinStaff columnistPosted: 01/07/2012 04:00:00 PM PSTUpdated: 01/09/2012 06:20:35 AM PSTIn November, Berkeley City Manager Phil Kamlarz traded his $250,000-a-year job for retirement with a starting pension of about $266,000 annually.The deal highlights the city’s generous pension program, which is one of the better plans in the state but by no means unique. The costly program is also $420 million underfunded, a shortfall equal to more than three years of city payroll, according to the city’s latest actuarial reports.Kamlarz’s hefty retirement pay was predictable. Three years ago, Mayor Tom Bates successfully persuaded his City Council colleagues to grant the city manager a series of raises to keep him on the job. As Bates pointed out then, Kamlarz could have collected just as much in retirement.The irony was that the raises didn’t solve the problem. Rather, they ensured that Kamlarz’s pension would increase by roughly a like amount whenever he finally walked out the door.As a result, whereas he could have left with a starting annual pension of $219,000 in January 2009, he left at the end of 2011 with 21 percent more a year for the rest of his life. The retirement pay also comes with annual cost-of-living adjustments.

via Daniel Borenstein: Berkeley city manager not unique retiring with bigger pension than salary – ContraCostaTimes.com.

 

JOE LEGAL vs. JOSE ILLEGAL Thursday, Sep 29 2011 

Axis of Idiots and Comarade Obama and Congress and Democrats and Failure and Government and Illegal Immigration and Neo-Marxists and RINO and Socialism and Stupid People and WTF Files , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1IDVET 05:23

I don’t know where this came from, I got it in an email, but it is rather poignant.

You have two families: “Joe Legal” and “Jose Illegal”.
Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California .

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes
$25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.

Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number,
and gets paid $15.00 cash “under the table”.

Ready? Now pay attention…

Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00
per year.. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now
has $31,231.00.

Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or
$31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has
$31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for
his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now
has $24,031.00.

Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and
local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has
$31,200.00.

Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or
welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per
year.. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps
and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe
Legal now has $9,631.00.

Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose
Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose
Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal
now has $7,231.00.

Jose Illegal says, “We don’t need no stinkin’ insurance!” and still has
$31,200.00.

Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline,
etc.

Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities,
gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after
work.

Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal’s and Jose Illegal’s children both attend the same school Joe
Legal pays for his children’s lunches while Jose Illegal’s children get
a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal’s children have an after
school ESL program. Joe Legal’s children go home.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services,
but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Do you get it, now?

If you vote for or support any politician that supports illegal
aliens…

You are part of the problem!

It’s way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!
What are you waiting for? Pass it on.

 

Ann Coulter on Pre-emption… Wednesday, Jul 14 2010 

Axis of Idiots and Buyers' Remorse and Comarade Obama and Congress and Democrats and Failure and Government and Illegal Immigration and Neo-Marxists and Political Correctness and Politics and Socialism and Stupid People , , , , , , , , , , 1IDVET 17:27

This is a good read. I think the government is totally going to lose this case.

Go Arizona!

Black Panthers, you’re free to go – not so fast, Arizona
By Ann Coulter

So I guess all that hysteria about the Arizona immigration law was much ado about nothing. After months of telling us that the Nazis had seized Arizona, when the Obama administration finally got around to suing, its only objection was that the law was “pre-empted” by federalimmigration law.

With the vast majority of Americans supporting Arizona’s inoffensive little law, the fact that Obama is suing at all suggests that he consulted exclusively with the craziest people in America before filing this complaint (which is to say, Eric Holder’s Justice Department).

But apparently even they could find nothing discriminatory about Arizona’s law. It’s reassuring to know that, contrary to earlier indications, government lawyers can at least read English.

Instead, the administration argues, federal laws on immigration pre-empt Arizona’s law under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

State laws are pre-empted by federal law in two circumstances: When there is a conflict – such as “sanctuary cities” for illegals or California’s medical marijuana law – or when Congress has so thoroughly regulated a field that there is no room for even congruent state laws.

More

 

United States vs. Arizona… Tuesday, Jul 6 2010 

Axis of Idiots and Buyers' Remorse and Comarade Obama and Congress and Democrats and Department of Homeland Stupidity and Failure and Government and Illegal Immigration and Lies and Neo-Marxists and Political Correctness and Politics and Socialism and Stupid People , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1IDVET 16:35

I really think that Arizona will prevail on this one. They aren’t usurping the federal government. They are merely assisting in the capture of illegal aliens that the government has failed miserably to do.

Feds to claim pre-emption in fight against AZ immigration-enforcement law
By Ed Morrissey

The Department of Justice will file a lawsuit this week, perhaps as early as today, against Arizona to block its new immigration-enforcement law.  They plan to use the weakest argument possible, that of pre-emption, which amounts to a surrender on the grounds that the Obama administration has claimed in the previous three months of debate:

The Justice Department has decided to file suit against Arizona on the grounds that the state’s new immigration law illegally intrudes on federal prerogatives, law enforcement sources said Monday.

More

 

Bumper Sticker of the Day, Illegal Isn’t a Race… Tuesday, May 18 2010 

Axis of Idiots and Bumper Sticker and Failure and Government and Illegal Immigration and Politics , , , , , , , 1IDVET 18:35

 

Bumper Sticker of the Day… Thursday, May 13 2010 

Bumper Sticker and Illegal Immigration and Politics and San Francisco , , , , , , 1IDVET 19:20

 

On Arizona and Such… Monday, May 10 2010 

Axis of Idiots and Buyers' Remorse and Comarade Obama and Congress and Democrats and Economics and Failure and Government and Illegal Immigration and Lies and Politics and Republicans and Stupid People and Tax , , , , , , , , , 1IDVET 15:34

Another excellent read from Victor Davis Hanson.

On illegal aliens:

How Could They Do That in Arizona!
The Arizona Hysteria
By Victor Davis Hanson

Racist! Nativist! Profiler! Xenophobe!

Write or say anything about illegal immigration, and one should expect to be called all of that and more—even if a strong supporter of legal immigration. Illegal alien becomes undocumented worker. Anti-immigrant replaces anti-illegal-immigration. “Comprehensive” is a euphemism for amnesty. Triangulation abounds. A fiery op-ed grandstands and deplores the Arizona law, but offers no guidance about illegal immigration — and blames the employer for doing something that the ethnic lobby in fact welcomes.

Nevertheless, here it goes from a supporter of legal immigration: how are we to make sense of the current Arizona debate? One should show concern about some elements of the law, but only in the context of the desperation of the citizens of Arizona. And one should show some skepticism concerning mounting liberal anguish, so often expressed by those whose daily lives are completely unaffected by the revolutionary demographic, cultural, and legal transformations occurring in the American Southwest.

As I understand the opposition to the recent Arizona law, it boils down to something like the following: the federal government’s past decision not to enforce its own law should always trump the state’s right to honor it. That raises interesting questions: Does the state contravene federal authority by exercising it? If the federal government does not protect the borders of a state, does the state have a right to do it itself? The federal government has seemed in the past to be saying that if one circumvented a federal law, and was known to have circumvented federal law with recognized impunity, then there was no longer a law to be enforced.

More

 

Arizona isn’t Laughing Obama… Saturday, May 8 2010 

Axis of Idiots and Buyers' Remorse and Comarade Obama and Congress and Failure and Government and Illegal Immigration and Politics and Stupid People and Truth and Video , , , , , , , , , 1IDVET 12:54

Obama is a moron, but we already knew this prior to the election. Unfortunately, 52% of the population drank the friggin’ Kool Aid.

Arizona is fighting back. Including fighting against the worst President that this nation has ever seen. Yes, Jimmy Carter was better. Go figure.

At any rate, check this out:

 

Another Racist Teabagger Against Illegal Immigration… Friday, May 7 2010 

Axis of Idiots and Failure and Government and Illegal Immigration and Politics and Stupid People and Truth and Video , , , , , , , 1IDVET 14:56

H/T Ace of Spades:

Maybe she doesn’t quite fit the MFM’s idea of a redneck teabagger, but she damn sure nails this one!

 

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers