Gun Ownership: A Rationale, Part 1 Sunday, Feb 19 2012 

Reblogged from Stately McDaniel Manor:

During the more than a year I was fortunate to share the Confederate Yankee Blog with Bob Owens, its founder, I wrote a series of articles on the rationale and practical issues of gun ownership.  With the beginning of a new year, and my new blog, I thought it worthwhile to produce a new, updated series on that issue and the many related issues swirling around it.  Among the issues one must consider with care is summed up by two questions and the answers to them: (1) Does evil exist? (2) What must be the …

This is an outstanding read. You are sorely missing out if you don’t read this. I’ve only read the first and can’t wait to read the rest of the series.

What If? Thursday, Feb 16 2012 

This is  from Andrew Napolitano. I can’t get the video to work, so, here’s the link to it on YouTube:

It’s pretty good, in my opinion.

What if…

Truth, lies and Afghanistan… Wednesday, Feb 8 2012 

With this title, how could I not post it? Good read.

Truth, lies and Afghanistan

How military leaders have let us down

By LT. COL. DANIEL L. DAVIS

I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking with U.S. troops and their Afghan partners. My duties with the Army’s Rapid Equipping Force took me into every significant area where our soldiers engage the enemy. Over the course of 12 months, I covered more than 9,000 miles and talked, traveled and patrolled with troops in Kandahar, Kunar, Ghazni, Khost, Paktika, Kunduz, Balkh, Nangarhar and other provinces.

What I saw bore no resemblance to rosy official statements by U.S. military leaders about conditions on the ground.

Entering this deployment, I was sincerely hoping to learn that the claims were true: that conditions in Afghanistan were improving, that the local government and military were progressing toward self-sufficiency. I did not need to witness dramatic improvements to be reassured, but merely hoped to see evidence of positive trends, to see companies or battalions produce even minimal but sustainable progress.

Instead, I witnessed the absence of success on virtually every level.

My arrival in country in late 2010 marked the start of my fourth combat deployment, and my second in Afghanistan. A Regular Army officer in the Armor Branch, I served in Operation Desert Storm, in Afghanistan in 2005-06 and in Iraq in 2008-09. In the middle of my career, I spent eight years in the U.S. Army Reserve and held a number of civilian jobs — among them, legislative correspondent for defense and foreign affairs for Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas.

As a representative for the Rapid Equipping Force, I set out to talk to our troops about their needs and their circumstances. Along the way, I conducted mounted and dismounted combat patrols, spending time with conventional and Special Forces troops. I interviewed or had conversations with more than 250 soldiers in the field, from the lowest-ranking 19-year-old private to division commanders and staff members at every echelon. I spoke at length with Afghan security officials, Afghan civilians and a few village elders.

I saw the incredible difficulties any military force would have to pacify even a single area of any of those provinces; I heard many stories of how insurgents controlled virtually every piece of land beyond eyeshot of a U.S. or International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) base.

I saw little to no evidence the local governments were able to provide for the basic needs of the people. Some of the Afghan civilians I talked with said the people didn’t want to be connected to a predatory or incapable local government.

From time to time, I observed Afghan Security forces collude with the insurgency.

via Truth, lies and Afghanistan – February 2012 – Armed Forces Journal – Military Strategy, Global Defense Strategy.

Defending the Constitution… Wednesday, Feb 8 2012 

The assault on our Constitution is unprecedented. This Administration and the Democrats in general have been spewing absolute shit out of their shit holes under their noses. If you think for one second that this President, or his minions are pro-America, you are absolutely delusional.

They can’t do it the right way, the way it is given in the Constitution, so they want to change our Constitution to fit their collective socialist agenda.

Keep this shit up, and there will be another revolution. Those of us that took the oath like myself, will defend the Constitution against ALL enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC, and are ready to continue to defend it even now.

You assholes that think you can trample on the Constitution without a fight, are in for a rude awakening.

‘Breaking Free From the Constraints of the Founding Fathers’
By Victor Davis Hanson

In the last week in the popular press and academic journals there have been several pre-election essays and op-eds about the cumbersome nature of the U.S. Constitution as we were reminded by the president and its unsuitability for emulation by other countries per Justice Ginsburg, given contemporary supposedly superior models. In addition, we are told that food stamps are a great win-win situation for everyone, and that breaking immigration laws are infractions not really violations.

What we have here is an assault on traditional American notions of self-reliance, respect for the law, and a sense of American exceptionalism as embodied by the Constitution. It is weird, to say the least, to even hint of superior constitutional systems elsewhere, given the current chaos in South Africa, and the coming implosion of the European Union — not to mention the mess in the Middle East and Russia.

via ‘Breaking Free From the Constraints of the Founding Fathers’ – By Victor Davis Hanson – The Corner – National Review Online.

AGW Debate, Scientists Changing Sides… Tuesday, Feb 7 2012 

Still not convinced eh? I am. CO2 is a gas, natural to the Earth. Plants eat that shit up. People and cars exhale that shit. More CO2, more plants, more food. Less starving people on the planet. Hmm, sounds like a good thing to me.

The sun heats up the Earth, sometimes a lot, sometimes not. The clouds cool the planet and recycle water through evaporation, which also cools the planet. Funny how that shit all works together to make a nice cozy planet to live on.

I know it’s a simple explanation, but it works.

At any rate, there are a couple converts from the green moron farm in Germany.

Via Hot Air Green Room:

Two more scientists change sides in the AGW debate

In fact, it seems as if it isn’t really much of a debate anymore.

First, let me be clear, the debate among scientists isn’t whether CO2 is a greenhouse gas or whether, even, it can cause warming, but instead on what real (if any) total effect it has overall on the climate. In other words, is there a saturation point where additional CO2 has little marginal effect, or does it build to a tipping point where the change is radical? Robust climate or delicate climate?

Evidence is building toward the robust climate theory, which would mean that while there may be more CO2 being emitted, it has little to no effect on the overall climate. That, of course, is contrary to the AGW crowd’s theory.

So, on to the latest high profile defections:

One of the fathers of Germany’s modern green movement, Professor Dr. Fritz Vahrenholt, a social democrat and green activist, decided to author a climate science skeptical book together with geologist/paleontologist Dr. Sebastian Lüning. Vahrenholt’s skepticism started when he was asked to review an IPCC report on renewable energy. He found hundreds of errors. When he pointed them out, IPCC officials simply brushed them aside. Stunned, he asked himself, “Is this the way they approached the climate assessment reports?”

Vahrenholt decided to do some digging. His colleague Dr. Lüning also gave him a copy of Andrew Montford’s The Hockey Stick Illusion. He was horrified by the sloppiness and deception he found. Persuaded by Hoffmann & Campe, he and Lüning decided to write the book. Die kalte Sonne cites 800 sources and has over 80 charts and figures. It examines and summarizes the latest science.

via Two more scientists change sides in the AGW debate « The Greenroom.

This Video Says it All… Tuesday, Feb 7 2012 

This video from CAGW says it all when it comes to the tax and spend culture we are currently living through. It will only get worse if we don’t stop the madness now.

Are libs sexually frustrated? Friday, Feb 3 2012 

This comes via Don Surber at the Daily Mail. This actually explains a lot.

Are libs sexually frustrated?

February 3, 2012 by Don Surber

Have the people at Match.com discovered the real reason why so many liberals are such a bunch of snarky, foul-mouthed scolds? Could it be bad sex that leads to bad politics? Or maybe it is the other way around, as bad politics leads to bad sex?

The Match.com‘s Singles in America found that liberals have 40% more sex than conservatives — but conservatives enjoy their sex more.

via Are libs sexually frustrated? « Don Surber.

How Much Money Does Obama Have to Buy a Vote? Wednesday, Feb 1 2012 

This should open your eyes a bit. If you’re not paying attention that is, or you’re a liberal moron, or a RINO. Yes, I’m talking to you idiots in the OWS crowd and their supporters just in case you missed the inference.

Here’s Bill Whittle:

31 January 1968: Tet Offensive began in South Vietnam Tuesday, Jan 31 2012 

Let’s not forget our brothers-in-arms from Vietnam. To those that served thank you. To those that died, rest in peace. All gave some, some gave all.

This day in history:

On January 31, 1968, some 70,000 North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces launched the Tet Offensive (named for the lunar new year holiday called Tet), a coordinated series of fierce attacks on more than 100 cities and towns in South Vietnam. General Vo Nguyen Giap, leader of the Communist People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN), planned the offensive in an attempt both to foment rebellion among the South Vietnamese population and encourage the United States to scale back its support of the Saigon regime. Though U.S. and South Vietnamese forces managed to hold off the Communist attacks, news coverage of the offensive (including the lengthy Battle of Hue) shocked and dismayed the American public and further eroded support for the war effort. Despite heavy casualties, North Vietnam achieved a strategic victory with the Tet Offensive, as the attacks marked a turning point in the Vietnam War and the beginning of the slow, painful American withdrawal from the region.

More

Democrats Are More Generous Than Republicans, But With Other People’s Money… Tuesday, Jan 31 2012 

This pretty much goes without saying, but it needs to be put out there more and more these days, because Democrats love to give money to others, just as long as it isn’t theirs. Along with their meme that Republicans are greedy and the like, this actually paints liberals as the greedier individuals.

Democrats Vs. Republicans: Who’s The Most Greedy?

Greed: Rich businessman Mitt Romney gave more than 16% of his income to charity last year. A few years back, Barack and Michelle Obama gave less than 1% of theirs. Aren’t Republicans supposed to be the heartless ones?

According to their tax returns, the Obamas gave to charitable causes just $10,772 of the $1.2 million they earned from 2000 through 2004. In 2005 and 2006, they boosted their giving a bit to 5%.

How about Vice President Joe Biden? Surely he could top the Obamas and save some face for the party that purports to be all about helping the poor. But no.

Biden and his wife gave an average of $369 a year to charity for the decade preceding his vice presidency, according to USA Today. That amounted to 0.3% of their income. They haven’t been much more generous since Biden became veep. In 2010, they gave $5,350, or roughly 1.4%.

via Democrats Are More Generous Than Republicans, But With Other People’s Money – Investors.com.

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.