U.S. Navy Rescues Iranian Sailors… Friday, Jan 6 2012 

Irony is dish that is best served, delicious…

(CNN) — U.S. sailors from a carrier strike group whose recent presence in the Persian Gulf drew the ire of Iranian military officials have rescued 13 of the Middle Eastern country’s sailors from a hijacked fishing boat, a military spokesman said Friday.

The destroyer USS Kidd came to the aid of the ship Thursday in the North Arabian sea, near the crucial Strait of Hormuz, according to the Navy.

The rescue prompted the captain of the freed ship to offer his “sincere gratitude,” according to Josh Schminky, a Navy Criminal Investigative Service agent aboard the Kidd.

“He was afraid that without our help, they could have been there for months,” said Schminky

The rescue Thursday came two days after Iran said the United States should not send any more warships into the Persian Gulf.

via U.S. Navy rescues Iranian sailors – CNN.com.

Agent Orange Coming to America? Wednesday, Dec 28 2011 

I just read this over at Mountain Republic’s site.

This is some serious shit. Go read it.

The affects of Agent Orange after all these years is still prevalent in Vietnam. Now they want to use one of the chemicals that made up 50% of the Agent Orange that was used in Vietnam on crops here in America. This is utter madness.

Why the hell aren’t more people pissed off about this? I figure it’s due to the fact that the media (MSM) is stone silent on it.

America’s Farmlands to be Carpet-Bombed with Vietnam-era Agent Orange Chemical

by Mike Adams

A key chemical of one of the most horrifying elements of the Vietnam War — Agent Orange — may soon be unleashed on America’s farmlands. Considered by world nations to be a “Weapon of Mass Destruction” (WMD), Agent Orange was dropped in the millions of gallons on civilian populations during the Vietnam War in order to destroy foliage and poison North Vietnamese soldiers. The former president of the Vietnamese Red Cross, Professor Nhan, described it as, “…a massive violation of human rights of the civilian population, and a weapon of mass destruction.”

Go read it all.

 

BBC News – Finland ‘finds Patriot missiles’ on China-bound ship… Thursday, Dec 22 2011 

Patriot missiles en-route to China? You’ve got to be kidding me. I wonder how much more of our technology goes to China. Shipping Patriot missiles is not uncommon when they are being shipped to allies, but this ship was bound for China via South Korea.   The ROK could have been the destination, but it seems that this was not a routine shipment to an ally.

I find this highly suspicious.

Routine checks by Finland’s traffic safety authority revealed a load of up to 160 tonnes of improperly packed nitroguanidine, a low-sensitivity explosive with a high detonation speed.”

Actually in our investigation at the moment, we have got the information that we found 69 Patriot missiles on the ship and around 160 tonnes of explosives,” said Detective Superintendent Timo Virtanen from the Finnish National Bureau of Investigation.

via BBC News – Finland ‘finds Patriot missiles’ on China-bound ship.

Ron Paul: Bradley Manning Is A “Hero” and a “Patriot”… Wednesday, Dec 21 2011 

Shit like this is why I can’t support Ron Paul. Plain and simple. Manning is a murderer by proxy with his intelligence leaks. He needs to hang for his crimes. How Paul can see this asshole as a “hero” and “patriot” is beyond the pale.

Ron “The Only Man Who Can Save America” Paul: Gender-Conflicted Sociopath and Traitor Bradley Manning Is A “Hero” and a “Patriot”.

Bradley Manning gave all the sensitive intelligence he could to WikiLeaks, which of course outed it all, in stages. The last bit outing — of the real names of our agents working in hostile countries, against their own governments or terrorist groups which have the favor of the government — was supposedly an “accident,” but that information was outed all the same.

via Ron “The Only Man Who Can Save America” Paul: Gender-Conflicted Sociopath and Traitor Bradley Manning Is A “Hero” and a “Patriot”.

The Diversity Platoon… Tuesday, Dec 20 2011 

This is an absolute must read. If like me, you think diversity is a whole steaming pile of bullshit heaped upon the masses through political correctness and is now creeping into the Armed Forces, then you have got to read this. Diversity will kill the military as a trusted institution.

The Current Situation

Forty years ago, the American military was held in great contempt by the public it served. The feeling was returned in roughly equal measure. We have since gone from mutual disdain to the point that the military polls as the nation’s most trusted institution. Those who first accomplished the turnaround were the very Vietnam and often WWII or Korean War or both veterans who had been lied about and spit upon. The vehicle that enabled them to make the change is erroneously called The All Volunteer Force AVF. In reality, it’s the “All Recruited Force.”

Those who molded the AVF pursued the single minded goal of improved war fighting capabilities. Those who followed them continued that pursuit…until, most unfortunately, relatively recently. The war fighting goal and most trusted institution status are now in danger of being buried under dual avalanches of operational commitments and political correctness, including the loudly proclaimed virtue of “diversity.”

via Free Range International » THE DIVERSITY PLATOON.

Army Versus Air/Sea Battle | Wings Over Iraq Wednesday, Dec 14 2011 

Excellent post on the coming conflict with China over at Wings Over Iraq. You do know that it is inevitable, right?

Anyway, good read.

The Army is infiltrating a way in – and on a direct challenge – to the “AirSea Battle” concept.

The world’s ‘s largest ocean at first glance seems kinda – all wet – for land forces. So far, only Air Force and Navy have best capitalized on concerns over China, with the 2 highest-tech services putting forward a joint approach to controlling the Western Pacific that they call “AirSea Battle.” (The name, ironically, is a tribute to the influential Army-Air Force “AirLand Battle” concept of the 1980s).

With the goal of revising its guiding “Capstone Concept” document early next year, This We’ll Defend has kicked off a series of conferences on its role after Afghanistan. At the first event, at the end of October, a conclave of experts addressing “alternative futures” for the year 2020 repeatedly highlighted the rise of China. But both the participants and the generals hosting them seemed vague on what the Army could actually do about it.

The argument here is that the Air Force and Navy have fixated on the parts of the China problem that are most suitable to their high-priced, high-tech systems – the clash between aircraft, warships, submarines, and electronic networks to secure or deny access to the Western Pacific – while they have ignored other aspects that the Army is best suited to address.

via Army Versus Air/Sea Battle | Wings Over Iraq.

Obama Adminstration – Fort Hood Massacre ‘Workplace Violence’ … Thursday, Dec 8 2011 

The Obama  administration has lost its friggin mind. Workplace violence? What a bunch of PC schmucks.

This asshole Hassan is a terrorist, traitor and murderer. Plain and simple.

Obama is a SCOAMF.

Sen. Susan Collins on Wednesday blasted the Defense Department for classifying the Fort Hood massacre as workplace violence and suggested political correctness is being placed above the security of the nation’s Armed Forces at home.

During a joint session of the Senate and House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday, the Maine Republican referenced a letter from the Defense Department depicting the Fort Hood shootings as workplace violence. She criticized the Obama administration for failing to identify the threat as radical Islam.

via Lawmakers Blast Administration For Calling Fort Hood Massacre ‘Workplace Violence’ | Fox News.

Pearl Harbor Attack Remembered at 70th Anniversary… Wednesday, Dec 7 2011 

More Pearl Harbor remembrance…

PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii (AP) — The Dec. 7, 1941, bombing of Pearl Harbor and those who lost their lives that day are being remembered Wednesday on the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack that brought the U.S. into World War II.

About 120 survivors will join Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, military leaders and civilians to observe a moment of silence in Pearl Harbor at 7:55 a.m. Hawaii time — the moment the attack began seven decades ago.

About 3,000 people are expected to attend the event held each year at a site overlooking the sunken USS Arizona and the white memorial that straddles the battleship.

The Pearl Harbor-based guided missile destroyer USS Chung-Hoon will render honors to the Arizona and blow its whistle at the start of a moment of silence at 7:55 a.m. — the same time 70 years ago the first Japanese planes began to attack.

via Pearl Harbor attack remembered at 70th anniversary – Yahoo! News.

Pearl Harbor Day Op Ed – A Reluctant Enemy Wednesday, Dec 7 2011 

Very well written piece. The war would have certainly been different had the Japanese not attacked the US. In fact, the 20th century would have been completely different.

ON a bright Hawaiian Sunday morning 70 years ago today, hundreds of Japanese warplanes appeared suddenly over Pearl Harbor and laid waste to the United States Pacific Fleet. The American people boiled over in righteous fury, and America plunged into World War II. The “date which will live in infamy” was the real turning point of the war, which had been raging for more than two years, and it opened an era of American internationalism and global security commitments that continues to this day.

By a peculiar twist of fate, the Japanese admiral who masterminded the attack had persistently warned his government not to fight the United States. Had his countrymen listened, the history of the 20th century might have turned out much differently.

Adm. Isoroku Yamamoto foresaw that the struggle would become a prolonged war of attrition that Japan could not hope to win. For a year or so, he said, Japan might overrun locally weak Allied forces — but after that, its war economy would stagger and its densely built wood-and-paper cities would suffer ruinous air raids. Against such odds, Yamamoto could “see little hope of success in any ordinary strategy.” His Pearl Harbor operation, he confessed, was “conceived in desperation.” It would be an all-or-nothing gambit, a throw of the dice: “We should do our best to decide the fate of the war on the very first day.”

via A Reluctant Enemy – NYTimes.com.

The Army ain’t Dumb (It’s Crazy)… Monday, Dec 5 2011 

If you think the Army is doing the right thing with its Medevac choppers sporting a red cross, you’re just as crazy as they are.

This is stupid. Plain and simple. Contact your congress critter and get them to hold the Army’s feet to the fire on this issue. Too many Soldiers are dying because of this policy.

The following comes from Michael Yon’s website.

The Army ain’t Dumb (It’s Crazy)

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

From World War II, we’ve heard reports that the enemy shot at Red Crosses emblazoned on medical vehicles, tents, and helmets. The Japanese were said to specifically target Red Crosses. The Germans were reported to do it from time to time. American troops in Europe and the Pacific sometimes covered the Red Crosses to avoid being hit.

World War II should have been enough to teach us a lesson. But the Army seemed dumb. There was a repeat in Korea. A retired military man forwarded a link to this Korean War video.

Notice at the 4min57sec mark, our troops are hiding a Red Cross. How many of our people were shot to pieces in WWII and Korea before they started covering the symbols?

Then our people fought in Vietnam. Our Dustoff helicopters sported Red Crosses and were shot down.

Dumb learns from pain. Insane just keeps bashing its head against the wall and expecting different results.

Fast forward past Iraq wherein people kept shooting at our Red Crosses. Today the enemy is doing the same in Afghanistan.

The Marines, Air Force, and British did not and do not sport Red Crosses in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The Army needs intervention.

As we move into 2012, after a decade of war in Afghanistan, the Army continues an insane policy that been insane for about seventy years. The policy has existed long enough to retire and draw Social Security. Dumb policies don’t get smarter with time.

Meanwhile, the Army has redoubled efforts to send unarmed helicopters sporting Red Crosses into battle. In Afghanistan, crosses often are seen as evil symbols.

Today, when you question the Army about the policy, they first try deception. They say they are following Geneva Conventions. This is untrue. Curiously, when the Army says this, they imply that the Air Force, Marines and British are breaking the Geneva Conventions.

The US Army is allowing troops to die on Afghan battlefields. It’s not just Soldiers who suffer. Army helicopters also rescue Marines, Air Force and Navy personnel in Afghanistan. The unarmed helicopters cause serious delays in medical evacuations, while exposing crews to greatly increased dangers.

This policy is wrong.

via The Army ain’t Dumb (It’s Crazy).

Take action! I did.

Write to your Congress critter, papers, anything that you think might help. We need the Army to change its ways.

Use this as a template if you like:

I am writing in regards to the Army’s policy to put a red cross on all its Medevac helicopters and to fly them unarmed into situations that warrant, at a minimum, an armed helicopter to recover wounded soldiers.

The main issue is the fact that:
1) The red cross on the helicopter is a target for Jihadists,
2) An unarmed helicopter cannot defend itself at the lower altitude that it operates in, even with top cover from an Apache attack helicopter, the angle of attack is limited,
3)The USMC and USAF do not adorn their Medevac helicopters with red crosses, and their helicopters are armed and can defend themselves,
4)The Army has to ensure that another armed helicopter asset is available to provide top cover, seriously reducing the assets available for close air support that could be used elsewhere,
5)The time that a Medevac has to recover a wounded soldier is longer because coordination with an attack aviation asset has to be made which could delay the arrival of the Medevac on station, jeopardizing the life of the wounded soldier.

In my opinion, and the opinion of others, it is a crime to send soldiers into combat unarmed in the Medevac helicopters as well as putting their lives in danger, the Soldiers that they are trying to get to are also placed in danger from the amount of time it takes to reach them, as well as being a target for every Jihadist with a gun.

I implore you to make a serious effort to get the Army to change its ways. There is no reason for the Army to have red crosses painted on their helicopters, other than out of a sense of entitlement for some general, or other.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.