Pearl Harbor Attack Remembered at 70th Anniversary… Wednesday, Dec 7 2011 

More Pearl Harbor remembrance…

PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii (AP) — The Dec. 7, 1941, bombing of Pearl Harbor and those who lost their lives that day are being remembered Wednesday on the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack that brought the U.S. into World War II.

About 120 survivors will join Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, military leaders and civilians to observe a moment of silence in Pearl Harbor at 7:55 a.m. Hawaii time — the moment the attack began seven decades ago.

About 3,000 people are expected to attend the event held each year at a site overlooking the sunken USS Arizona and the white memorial that straddles the battleship.

The Pearl Harbor-based guided missile destroyer USS Chung-Hoon will render honors to the Arizona and blow its whistle at the start of a moment of silence at 7:55 a.m. — the same time 70 years ago the first Japanese planes began to attack.

via Pearl Harbor attack remembered at 70th anniversary – Yahoo! News.

Pearl Harbor Day Op Ed – A Reluctant Enemy Wednesday, Dec 7 2011 

Very well written piece. The war would have certainly been different had the Japanese not attacked the US. In fact, the 20th century would have been completely different.

ON a bright Hawaiian Sunday morning 70 years ago today, hundreds of Japanese warplanes appeared suddenly over Pearl Harbor and laid waste to the United States Pacific Fleet. The American people boiled over in righteous fury, and America plunged into World War II. The “date which will live in infamy” was the real turning point of the war, which had been raging for more than two years, and it opened an era of American internationalism and global security commitments that continues to this day.

By a peculiar twist of fate, the Japanese admiral who masterminded the attack had persistently warned his government not to fight the United States. Had his countrymen listened, the history of the 20th century might have turned out much differently.

Adm. Isoroku Yamamoto foresaw that the struggle would become a prolonged war of attrition that Japan could not hope to win. For a year or so, he said, Japan might overrun locally weak Allied forces — but after that, its war economy would stagger and its densely built wood-and-paper cities would suffer ruinous air raids. Against such odds, Yamamoto could “see little hope of success in any ordinary strategy.” His Pearl Harbor operation, he confessed, was “conceived in desperation.” It would be an all-or-nothing gambit, a throw of the dice: “We should do our best to decide the fate of the war on the very first day.”

via A Reluctant Enemy – NYTimes.com.

Pearl Harbor Day (2011)… Wednesday, Dec 7 2011 

Today is Pearl Harbor Day, December 7th, 2011. Exactly 70 years from that fateful day.
If you have a flag, fly it at half staff today.


From the History Channel:

Just before 8 on the morning of December 7, 1941, hundreds of Japanese fighter planes attacked the American naval base at Pearl Harbor near Honolulu, Hawaii. The barrage lasted just two hours, but it was devastating: The Japanese managed to destroy nearly 20 American naval vessels, including eight enormous battleships, and almost 200 airplanes. More than 2,000 Americans soldiers and sailors died in the attack, and another 1,000 were wounded. The day after the assault, President Franklin D. Roosevelt asked Congress to declare war on Japan; Congress approved his declaration with just one dissenting vote. Three days later, Japanese allies Germany and Italy also declared war on the United States, and again Congress reciprocated. More than two years into the conflict, America had finally joined World War II.

The National Geographic also has a website dedicated to the attack on Pearl Harbor, I suggest that you go and visit their website for an in depth review of the attack.

They also have an interactive timeline you can look at as well.

Newer posts will come in under this one today.

The Army ain’t Dumb (It’s Crazy)… Monday, Dec 5 2011 

If you think the Army is doing the right thing with its Medevac choppers sporting a red cross, you’re just as crazy as they are.

This is stupid. Plain and simple. Contact your congress critter and get them to hold the Army’s feet to the fire on this issue. Too many Soldiers are dying because of this policy.

The following comes from Michael Yon’s website.

The Army ain’t Dumb (It’s Crazy)

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

From World War II, we’ve heard reports that the enemy shot at Red Crosses emblazoned on medical vehicles, tents, and helmets. The Japanese were said to specifically target Red Crosses. The Germans were reported to do it from time to time. American troops in Europe and the Pacific sometimes covered the Red Crosses to avoid being hit.

World War II should have been enough to teach us a lesson. But the Army seemed dumb. There was a repeat in Korea. A retired military man forwarded a link to this Korean War video.

Notice at the 4min57sec mark, our troops are hiding a Red Cross. How many of our people were shot to pieces in WWII and Korea before they started covering the symbols?

Then our people fought in Vietnam. Our Dustoff helicopters sported Red Crosses and were shot down.

Dumb learns from pain. Insane just keeps bashing its head against the wall and expecting different results.

Fast forward past Iraq wherein people kept shooting at our Red Crosses. Today the enemy is doing the same in Afghanistan.

The Marines, Air Force, and British did not and do not sport Red Crosses in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The Army needs intervention.

As we move into 2012, after a decade of war in Afghanistan, the Army continues an insane policy that been insane for about seventy years. The policy has existed long enough to retire and draw Social Security. Dumb policies don’t get smarter with time.

Meanwhile, the Army has redoubled efforts to send unarmed helicopters sporting Red Crosses into battle. In Afghanistan, crosses often are seen as evil symbols.

Today, when you question the Army about the policy, they first try deception. They say they are following Geneva Conventions. This is untrue. Curiously, when the Army says this, they imply that the Air Force, Marines and British are breaking the Geneva Conventions.

The US Army is allowing troops to die on Afghan battlefields. It’s not just Soldiers who suffer. Army helicopters also rescue Marines, Air Force and Navy personnel in Afghanistan. The unarmed helicopters cause serious delays in medical evacuations, while exposing crews to greatly increased dangers.

This policy is wrong.

via The Army ain’t Dumb (It’s Crazy).

Take action! I did.

Write to your Congress critter, papers, anything that you think might help. We need the Army to change its ways.

Use this as a template if you like:

I am writing in regards to the Army’s policy to put a red cross on all its Medevac helicopters and to fly them unarmed into situations that warrant, at a minimum, an armed helicopter to recover wounded soldiers.

The main issue is the fact that:
1) The red cross on the helicopter is a target for Jihadists,
2) An unarmed helicopter cannot defend itself at the lower altitude that it operates in, even with top cover from an Apache attack helicopter, the angle of attack is limited,
3)The USMC and USAF do not adorn their Medevac helicopters with red crosses, and their helicopters are armed and can defend themselves,
4)The Army has to ensure that another armed helicopter asset is available to provide top cover, seriously reducing the assets available for close air support that could be used elsewhere,
5)The time that a Medevac has to recover a wounded soldier is longer because coordination with an attack aviation asset has to be made which could delay the arrival of the Medevac on station, jeopardizing the life of the wounded soldier.

In my opinion, and the opinion of others, it is a crime to send soldiers into combat unarmed in the Medevac helicopters as well as putting their lives in danger, the Soldiers that they are trying to get to are also placed in danger from the amount of time it takes to reach them, as well as being a target for every Jihadist with a gun.

I implore you to make a serious effort to get the Army to change its ways. There is no reason for the Army to have red crosses painted on their helicopters, other than out of a sense of entitlement for some general, or other.

Breaking the Barrier… Monday, Dec 5 2011 

A little humor for your Monday…

El Paso Residents ‘Under the Gun’ When Peaceably Addressing Government… Monday, Dec 5 2011 

This is pretty pathetic and scary all at once. Freedom of speech and the right to bare arms are infringed all at once. This is the future of America, if Democrats get their way. No redress of grievances and no guns to defend yourself from their tyranny.

Wake up America. We don’t need another Britain.

By David Codrea at Gun Rights Examiner

via Why are El Paso residents ‘under the gun’ when peaceably addressing government? – National gun rights | Examiner.com.

“Mayor: Freedom of speech is over,” a story filed this morning by Bob Unruh on WorldNetDaily reports.A citizen attempting to address the El Paso City Council was given only 70 seconds to speak by Mayor John Cook when he abruptly cut her off, declaring: “Thank you, your time is over. If you can’t remove yourself from the podium, I’ll have you removed. Yeah. You can take your freedom of speech outside.”This is spite of the fact that the First Amendment specifically articulates a right “to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” and all public officials, per Article. VI. of the Constitution specifically requires “all executive and judicial Officers…of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…”

CRS: Afghanistan Casualties – Military and Civilians… Thursday, Dec 1 2011 

The CRS has released the casualties numbers for Afghanistan.
The last two years have been the worst.

Afghanistan Casualties – Military and Civilians

« Previous Page

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.