Once again the douche-bags at EPA have stopped offshore oil drilling off the coast of Alaska.
We are at record highs for gas prices and they are going to go even higher. This administration and their cronies in the EPA are a big reason why things are the way they are now.
It is time to defund and close down the EPA permanently. They base their decisions on fantasy not fact.
Here’s a fact for you. The area that Shell Oil is looking at drilling has more oil than all the oil that has gone through the Alaskan pipeline in 30 years.
Yeah, we can use that. No, the EPA thinks a ships “greenhouse emissions” not taken into consideration is enough to screw over the American people with higher gas prices and lower competitiveness across the globe.
By Dan Springer
Shell Oil Company has announced it must scrap efforts to drill for oil this summer in the Arctic Ocean off the northern coast of Alaska. The decision comes following a ruling by the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board to withhold critical air permits. The move has angered some in Congress and triggered a flurry of legislation aimed at stripping the EPA of its oil drilling oversight.
Shell has spent five years and nearly $4 billion dollars on plans to explore for oil in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. The leases alone cost $2.2 billion. Shell Vice President Pete Slaiby says obtaining similar air permits for a drilling operation in the Gulf of Mexico would take about 45 days. He’s especially frustrated over the appeal board’s suggestion that the Arctic drill would somehow be hazardous for the people who live in the area. “We think the issues were really not major,” Slaiby said, “and clearly not impactful for the communities we work in.”
The closest village to where Shell proposed to drill is Kaktovik, Alaska. It is one of the most remote places in the United States. According to the latest census, the population is 245 and nearly all of the residents are Alaska natives. The village, which is 1 square mile, sits right along the shores of the Beaufort Sea, 70 miles away from the proposed off-shore drill site.
The EPA’s appeals board ruled that Shell had not taken into consideration emissions from an ice-breaking vessel when calculating overall greenhouse gas emissions from the project. Environmental groups were thrilled by the ruling.