Oops! Did I Do Thaaaat? Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

did_i_do_that

Looks like the “moderate” conservatives are waking up to the reality of their stupidity. They voted for Obama because he talked in centrist terms prior to his election. He is after all a great orator. His actions thus far have proven to be quite left of center in more ways than one expected after his BS during the election campaign.

I saw right through it. 47% of America, saw right through it. The rest of you? When will you stop drinking the Kool-Aid?

Never Yet Melted has a round up…

Brooks and Buckley Experience Buyers’ Remorse

Related:

On Brooks and Done

A few quick thoughts as a follow-up to Dan’s post on the ever wrong – yet still ever presumptuous – David Brooks, who is just now beginning to realize that the halo he saw around Obama’s head during those 2 years of campaigning was the product of CGI and creative Hollywood lighting, not a function of political beatitude, manifesting itself through prisms of Iceland spar and Platonic Hope onto the psychic cave walls of those who are open to being saved.

Meanwhile, those of us who made the argument, in advance of helping to get him elected, about Obama’s rather baldly progressive nature – forcefully, at the time, and with not a little bit of thoughtful consideration – aren’t, as yet, invited to participate in “Conservatism 2.0: The Reckoning,” a space for all the movers and shakers of the conservative movement to stake out a strategy for how to find their way out of the political wilderness.

Perhaps, some are arguing, if we’d played nice and called Obama a Good Man, we’d have shown ourselves capable of the kind of “grown up” diplomacy a wannabe “media agency” is hoping to project – and so won the support of the “moderate middle.”

- Which, how’d that work out for you, Maverick?

More

Women’s History Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

I am not a fan of the insert race/gender flavor of the month history, but I suppose it does have some benefit, after all, it is history.

The CATO institute has a good take on three women that have had a huge impact on capitalism, and libertarianism.

Three Women Who Launched a Movement

Sixty-six years ago, thoughtful, well-intentioned, educated people in the United States all understood that socialism was the future. The average citizen might have retained a quaint belief in the American system of free enterprise, limited government, and individual rights, but among the cognoscenti — academics, artists, newspaper and radio pundits — it was widely recognized that the capitalist experiment had run its course. The overwhelming consensus was that the coming century would see economies managed by benevolent experts: the chaotic, dog-eat-dog competition of the market would give way to rational central planning.

History has been unkind to the old conventional wisdom. But the intellectual sea change preceded the visible collapse of socialist economies. The first real sign of the resurrection of the classical liberal idea came with the publication in 1943 of three groundbreaking books unabashedly defending individualism and free-market capitalism. Almost as unorthodox as the books’ contents, in the climate of the 1940s, were their authors — three remarkable women described by libertarian journalist John Chamberlain in his memoir:

If it had been left to pusillanimous males probably nothing much would have happened…. Indeed, it was three women — [Isabel] Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Ayn Rand — who, with scornful side glances at the male business community, had decided to rekindle a faith in an older American philosophy. There wasn’t an economist among them. And none of them was a Ph.D.

I had already absorbed the message of Albert Jay Nock’s Our Enemy the State and Hillaire Belloc’s The Servile State, but it was Isabel Paterson’s The God of the Machine, Rose Lane’s The Discovery of Freedom, and Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead and (later) Atlas Shrugged that turned Nock’s conception of social power into detailed reality. These books made it plain that if life was to be something more than a naked scramble for government favors, a new attitude toward the producer must be created.

More

It’s Worse… Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

More on the porkulus.

A ‘Stimulus’ Bill that Makes Us Worse Off

Posted by Doug Bandow

Even after being in Washington for nearly three decades, I still occasionally marvel at the stupidity and foolishness of the denizens of Capitol Hill.  Like the recent “stimulus” bill.  There’s no doubt that it is waste and abuse personified, much of it derived from the standard big-spending liberal wish list.  But we were told that wouldn’t matter, since spending, any spending, is what was necessary to get the economy moving.

But it turns out that even the Congressional Budget Office–the legislative branch’s own analytical agency–figures the legislation will make us worse in the long-term.  On Monday CBO reaffirmed its earlier conclusion:

More

Nuts Are Next to the What? Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

I can’t resist. My humor bone is easily tickled.

CNN Anchor Can’t Tell ‘Nuts From …

A U.S. airline is now selling “penis” on flights, an anchorwoman has declared.

The slip-up happened on CNN when anchorwoman Zain Verjee was reporting about Northwest Airlines now selling peanuts on flights.

Verjee mentioned the word “penis” three times instead of “peanuts.”

“Northwest began serving penis this month as its merger partner Atlanta-based Delta airlines has done for years,” Verjee said.

“Georgia is the top penis producing state in the country.”

The footage has been uploaded to YouTube in many different versions and has become an internet sensation with more than 700,000 views today.

Perhaps the caption at the bottom of the screen distracted her – it declared “nuts on Northwest flights.”


Obama and Co. will be cRUSHed… Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

The left are out of their league.

Going after Rush will bite them in the ass. I will enjoy this popcorn fest. Going after President Bush was easy. He didn’t fight back. Rush will crush these morons with wit and intelligence that will make their heads spin.

Rush Job: Inside Dems’ Limbaugh plan

Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.

The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.

More

Obama appoints Rush Limbaugh leader of the opposition

By James Lewis

Rush Limbaugh ‘just an entertainer?” Well, Mark Twain was an entertainer. But he was also one of the finest satirical voices in our history, a searing mocker of our national conscience at the time of slavery. He made people laugh until it hurt, but his aim was fundamentally moral.

For the Chairman of the Republican Party to call Limbaugh “just an entertainer” is both inaccurate and political suicide.  Michael Steele saw that quickly, and apologized.  ‘Nuff said.

Steele allowed himself to slip on CNN’s carefully scripted banana peel, but he knew better. Most of our media Neanderthals don’t. They really are ignorant, and the more cocksure they sound, the more you can be sure they don’t get the Limbaugh phenomenon. After all, they aren’t picked for their capacity for independent thought. Our media artistes begin as Party hacks, like Stephanopoulos, Matthews, Moyers and Russert. They’re picked for their completely predictable mindset. Novel ideas are anathema. That’s why they’re finally going down in the marketplace, and good riddance to ‘em.

More

Obama is a Clueless Liberal Hack. Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

Obama is a clueless hack. He doesn’t understand how the economy works. He doesn’t understand that what he says has effect on millions of people. Or, he doesn’t care. I am having a hard time figuring this one out.

Every time he opens his mouth, I lose money. I have lost 40% of my retirement savings since this asshole was elected. I don’t take that lightly.

A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

President Obama simply does not get it. Rather than put forward a plan that puts Americans back to work by letting Americans choose how to best stimulate the economy — i.e., across the board tax cuts — he believes government should be in control. The Obama plan is to inject government into more aspects of our lives and have a select few people — the rich — pay for it. Question, if the people who actually hire workers are forced to pay even higher taxes, do you really think they will hire as many workers?

Obama’s latest comments regarding the stock market are further proof that he is either out of touch with American society or he is purposely leading us down a path to socialism. His flippant comparison of the stock market to a public opinion poll shows how little he connects with hard-working Americans. As families’ retirement savings are going up in smoke, Obama is dismissing the Dow as irrelevant. Ok, let’s just say the Dow is like an opinion poll… then, I have a picture for you… a picture that is worth a thousand words…

More

Going Galt Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

Prepare to get taxed out of existence. Team BO is going to screw you by screwing those that provide goods and services. By raising their taxes, they in turn will raise their prices. Not too smart. Not too transparent either.

Just remember; you idiots voted for this. I “hope” the “change” pleases you. It pisses me off to no end.

Time to go Galt on his ass.

Obama's plan to hike taxes meets fierce opposition

WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama’s call to raise taxes on high earners and greenhouse gas polluters met fierce opposition Tuesday from congressional Republicans and also a few Democrats. “I would never want to adversely affect anything that is charitable or good,” Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, said of Obama’s call to limit high-income taxpayers’ itemized deductions for charitable donations and mortgage interest.

Republicans said the president’s plan to charge fees to industries that spew greenhouse gases amounts to a stealthy tax increase for all Americans that will far exceed the new $400 annual tax cut for workers that he wants to extend beyond 2010.

More

From Michelle Malkin’s site:

“Going Galt:” America’s wealth producers vs. wealth redistributors
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009

Enough. In a word, that is the message of disgusted taxpayers fed up with the confiscatory policies of both parties in Washington. George Bush pre-socialized the economy with billion-dollar bailouts of the financial and auto industries. Barack Obama is pouring billions more down those sinkholes. The camel’s back isn’t just broken. His neck and four legs have all snapped, too.

Enough. Last Friday, thousands of Americans turned out to protest reckless government spending in the pork-laden stimulus package, the earmark-clogged budget bill, the massive mortgage entitlement program, and taxpayer-funded corporate rescues. Contrary to false left-wing blog smears that the hastily-planned impromptu events were “Astro-turfed,” the crowds were packed with first-time grass-roots activists. They were people with families and day jobs whose usual definition of “community organizing” involves neighborhood yard sales or their kids’ soccer matches. They were members of the silent majority who decided to be silent no more.

More

Free Speech, Liberals, Islam… Wednesday, Mar 4 2009 

I bring this to you in light of the fact that the left is trying its utmost to make America like Europe. In doing so, they will spawn similar crap here. They have already been doing it; it’s just not as noticeable as in Europe. Free speech is under attack from the left and Islam. The left are such lunatics, that they don’t realize that enabling Islam will ultimately work against their own causes, such as homosexuality, women’s rights, the freedom to criticize government, and the list goes on and on. That’s why liberalism is a mental disorder. They are willing to kill themselves to make nice to a bunch of idiots. Islam isn’t a religion, it’s government based on the teachings of a psychopathic pedophile.

In case you missed it; here is Geert Wilders’ speech at the Four Seasons in New York on February 23:

Thank you.

Thank you very much for inviting me. And – to the immigration authorities – thank you for letting me into this country. It is always a pleasure to cross a border without being sent back on the first plane.

Today, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack all throughout Europe. Free speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural element of our existence, our birth right, is now something we once again have to battle for.

As you might know, I will be prosecuted, because of my film Fitna, my remarks regarding Islam, and my view concerning what some call a ‘religion of peace’. A few years from now, I might be a criminal.

Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue; I gave up my freedom four years ago. I am under full-time police protection ever since. The real question is: will free speech be put behind bars? And the larger question for the West is: will we leave Europe’s children the values of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem, or the values of Mecca, Teheran and Gaza?

This is what video blogger Pat Condell said in one of his latest you tube appearances. He says: “If I talked about Muslims the way their holy book talks about me, I’d be arrested for hate speech.” Now, Mr Condell is a stand-up comedian, but in the video he is dead serious and the joke is on us. Hate speech will always be used against the people defending the West – in order to please and appease Muslims. They can say whatever they want: throw gays from apartment buildings, kill the Jews, slaughter the infidel, destroy Israel, jihad against the West. Whatever their book tells them.

Today, I come before you to warn of a great threat. It is called Islam. It poses as a religion, but its goals are very worldly: world domination, holy war, sharia law, the end of the separation of church and state, slavery of women, the end of democracy. It is NOT a religion, it is an political ideology. It demands your respect, but has no respect for you.

There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Islam will never change, because it is built on two rocks that are forever, two fundamental beliefs that will never change, and will never alter. First, there is the Quran, Allah’s personal word, uncreated, forever, with orders that need to be fulfilled regardless of place or time. And second, there is al-insal al-kamil, the perfect man, Muhammad the role model, whose deeds are to be imitated by all Muslims. And since Muhammad was a warlord and a conqueror we know what to expect. Islam means submission, so there cannot be any mistake about it’s goal. That’s a given. It’s fact.

This is Europe 2009. Muslim settlers calling for our destruction, and free speech on trial. All this is the outcome of a sick and evil ideology, the ideology that is weakening us, the surrender ideology of cultural relativism. It believes that all cultures are equal, and therefore Islam deserves an equal place in the West. It is their duty, the left thinks, to facilitate Islam. This way the cultural relativists paradise comes within reach and we will all be happy, and sing kumbaya.

The forces of Islam couldn’t agree more. Islam being facilitated by government is their agenda too. But they see it as jizya, the money dhimmis pay in order not to be killed or raped by their Muslim masters. Therefore, they happily accept the welfare cheque or the subsidies for their mosque or the money governments donate to their organizations.

This is just one example of cultural relativists and Muslim settlers having the same agenda. There is another. Islam considers itself a religion and therefore we are not permitted to criticize it. The left agrees. Although it hated Christianity for decades, now that Islam appears on the scene, they suddenly change course and demand ‘respect’ for something they call a religion.

Again we see the left and Islam having the same agenda: it is a religion, so shut up.

This all culminates in a third coming-together: nor the left nor Islam is in favor of criticism. In fact, given the opportunity, they would simply outlaw it. Multiculturalism is the left’s pet project. It is actually their religion. Their love of it is so great, if you oppose it, it must be hate. And if you say it, it is labeled hate speech. Now here is something the Islam can agree on.

This is the essence of my short introduction today: where the left and Islam come together, freedom will suffer.

My friends, make no mistake, my prosecution is a full-fledged attack by the left on freedom of speech in order to please Muslims. It was started by a member of the Dutch Labour party, and the entire legal proceeding is done by well-to-do liberals, the radical chic of Dutch society, the snobbish left. Too much money, too much time, too little love of liberty. If you read what the court of Amsterdam has written about me, you read the same texts that cultural relativists produce.

How low can we go in the Netherlands? About my prosecution, The Wall Street Journal noted: “this is no small victory for Islamic regimes seeking to export their censorship laws to wherever Muslims reside”. The Journal concluded that by The Netherlands accepting the free speech standards of, “Saudi-Arabia”, I stand correct in my observation that – I quote – “Muslim immigration is eroding traditional Dutch liberties”.

Now, if the Wall Street Journal has the moral clarity to see that my prosecution is the logical outcome of our disastrous, self-hating, multiculturalists immigration policies, then why can’t the European liberal establishment see the same thing? Why aren’t they getting at least a little bit scared by the latest news out of, for example, the UK. News that tells that the Muslim population in Britain is growing ten times as fast as the rest of society. Why don’t they care?

The answer is: they don’t care because they are blinded by their cultural relativism. Their disdain of the West is so much greater than the appreciation of our many liberties. And therefore, they are willing to sacrifice everything. The left once stood for women rights, gay rights, equality, democracy. Now, they favour immigration policies that will end all this. Many even lost their decency. Elite politicians have no problem to participate in or finance demonstrations where settlers shout “Death to the Jews”. Seventy years after Auschwitz they know of no shame.

Two weeks ago, I tried to get into Britain, a fellow EU country. I was invited to give a speech in Parliament. However, upon arrival at London airport, I was refused entry into the UK, and sent back on the first plane to Holland. I would have loved to have reminded the audience of a great man who once spoke in the House of Commons. In 1982 President Reagan gave a speech there very few people liked. Reagan called upon the West to reject communism and defend freedom. He introduced a phrase: ‘evil empire’. Reagan’s speech stands out as a clarion call to preserve our liberties. I quote: If history teaches anything, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly. What Reagan meant is that you cannot run away from history, you cannot escape the dangers of ideologies that are out to destroy you. Denial is no option.

So, what should we do? Is this a good moment for freedom-loving people to give in or to change course? To all-of-a-sudden start singing praise of Islam, or proclaiming there is such a thing as a moderate Islam? Will we now accept the continuation of Muslim mass immigration to the West? Will we appease sharia and jihad? Should we sacrifice gay rights and women rights? Or democracy? Should we sell out Israel, our dearest ally, and a frontline state of Islam?

Well, my humble opinion is: No way, Jose!

I suggest to defend freedom in general and freedom of speech in particular. I propose the withdrawal of all hate speech legislation in Europe. I propose a European First Amendment. In Europe we should defend freedom of speech like you Americans do. In Europe freedom of speech should be extended, instead of restricted. Of course, calling for violence or unjustly yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre have to be punished, but the right to criticize ideologies or religions are necessary conditions for a vital democracry. As George Orwell once said: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”.

Let us defend freedom of speech and let us gain strength and work hard to become even stronger. Millions think just like you and me. Millions think liberty is precious. That democracy is better than sharia. And after all, why should we be afraid? Our many freedoms and our prosperity are the result of centuries of endeavour. Centuries of hard work and sacrifice. We do not stand alone, and we stand on the shoulders of giants.

Late December 1944 the American army was suddenly faced with a last-ditch effort by the Germans. In the Ardennes, in the Battle of the Bulge, Hitler and his national-socialists fought for their last chance. And they were very successful. Americans faced defeat, and death.

In the darkest of winter, in the freezing cold, in a lonely forest with snow and ice as even fiercer enemies than the Nazi war machine itself, the American army was told to surrender. That might be their only chance to survive. But General McAuliffe thought otherwise. He gave the Germans a short message. This message contained just four letters. Four letters only, but never in the history of freedom was a desire for liberty and perseverance in the face of evil expressed more eloquently than in that message. It spelled N – U – T – S. “Nuts”.

My friends, the national-socialists got the message. Because it left no room for interpretation!

I suggest we walk in the tradition of giants like General McAuliffe and the American soldiers who fought and died for the freedom of my country and for a secular and democratic Europe, and we tell the enemies of freedom just that. NUTS! Because that’s all there is to it. No explanations. No beating around the bush. No caveats.

Our enemies should know: we will never apologize for being free men, we will never bow for the combined forces of Mecca and the left. And we will never surrender. We stand on the shoulders of giants. There is no stronger power than the force of free men fighting for the great cause of liberty. Because freedom is the birthright of all man.

Here’s some related Islam news:

Clinton criticizes Israeli breach of 'road map'...

...vows to work towards Palestinian state

Iran urges world Muslim 'resistance' against Israel...

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.