ACORN and Obama Wednesday, Feb 18 2009 

Your tax dollars at work. ACORN is a huge arm of the liberal party in this country. Thanks to their shenanigans in the last election, plus their continuing lawless behavior and agenda, America will suffer even more. God I hate liberals, forgive me, but I do.

ACORN and Obama: Together Again

by Michelle Malkin

Fresh off the trillion-dollar porkulus bill signing in Denver, President Obama immediately launched into his next New Raw Deal expansion: a massive mortgage entitlement program forcing lenders to refinance at an initial cost of $50 billion to $100 billion. That’s in addition to the bipartisan-supported $50 billion in the “stimulus” bill to bail out homeowners underwater on their mortgages and the $2 billion in “neighborhood stabilization” funds to alleviate the foreclosure crisis.

In tandem with the White House Bad Borrowers Bailout, Obama’s old friends at the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) are launching a new campaign of their own: the “Home Savers” campaign. What a coinky-dinky, huh? As with most of the bully tactics of the radical left-wing group, it ain’t gonna be pretty. They are the shock troops on the streets doing the dirty work while the Community Organizer-in-Chief keeps his delicate hands clean.

More

Related:

NY Times Plants Pro-ACORN Propaganda

New York Times metro-beat reporter Fernanda Santos seems to truly believe that the left-wing housing activist group ACORN is some bottom-up citizens organization conducting a new civil rights “resistance movement” against unfair foreclosures. That’s judging by her credulous story, “A Bid to Link Arms Against Eviction — Grass-Roots Effort Takes Shape To Support Families Facing Foreclosure.”

There’s nothing in Santos’s story Wednesday about the fact that the leader of this alleged “grass-roots effort,” ACORN, receives funding from the federal government through various federal programs and third-party groups, or that it registered thousands and thousands of ineligible voters during the last presidential campaign. Instead, readers were treated to 1,260 words of “power to the people” sloganeering straight from ACORN without a single dissenting voice.

More

Jobs? What Jobs? Wednesday, Feb 18 2009 

It’s about the jobs? Some jobs, those that government provides, are generally useless to the public at large. They do nothing to stimulate growth, or quality of life that the free market has and continues to do.

Most of the garbage in this bill that does actually create a job is in the construction industry. What about that poor slob that is a car salesman? How does that help him? Just sayin’.

Obama’s Stimulus Creates Useless Jobs

by Ben Shapiro

There’s one reason, and one reason only, that President Barack Obamas stimulus passed so swiftly through Congress: Most Americans are worried about their jobs. And Barack Obama promises to save or create four million jobs. Even Obama’s most ardent opponents embrace the make jobs programs embedded in the stimulus. Construction projects that put people to work, that fits the bill, Sarah Palin told Greta Van Susteran of Fox News. But these big, huge, expanded social programs that’s not right, that’s not fair.

Neither Republicans nor Democrats get it. The problem isnt just the pork barrel social welfare spending. It’s not merely the redistributionist scheme disguised as tax cuts. The public relations backbone of this bill — government spending on our nations crumbling infrastructure — is misguided. While the country’s infrastructure may need revamping, this sort of spending will not stimulate the economy. It will not create the kind of jobs Americans need.

More

Comparing FDR and Obama Wednesday, Feb 18 2009 

A great comparison of FDR and Obama. The similarities are staggering. It’s not a hard thing to do.

Uncanny, Disturbing Historical Parallels

by David Limbaugh

Recently, I reread the chapters on the New Deal in Larry Schweikart’s superb “A Patriot’s History of the United States” to review parallels with Barack Obama’s radical economic agenda. Here is an eye-opening, side-by-side sampling, with Schweikart’s observations on FDR and the New Deal, along with mine on President Obama and his policies.

Schweikart wrote, “During the campaign, FDR, a man whose presidency would feature by far the largest expansion of the federal government ever, called for a balanced budget and accused Hoover of heading the ‘greatest spending Administration in all our history.’”

Obama’s stimulus bill sets frightening new records for federal spending. But while campaigning, he said, “I’m running for president because I believe we can choose our own economic destiny to go another four years with the same reckless fiscal policies that have busted our budget, wreaked havoc in our economy, and mortgaged our children’s future on a mountain of debt; or we can restore fiscal responsibility in Washington.”

More

Gun Control Lies Tuesday, Feb 17 2009 

Gun control is an issue that the left has espoused as their own. Unfortunately, as usual, they are wrong on this issue as well.

Time and again, data proves the Brady anti-gun nut jobs wrong, and yet they still lie about it.

Here’s some more data that proves Brady’s anti-gun stance is knee jerk at best, downright dishonest at worst.

Howard Nemerov explores this in detail:

Another Brady hallucination: More guns, more ‘gun violence’ (Part 1)

A recent USA Today article discussed pending legislation on the open carrying of holstered handguns. It also afforded the Brady Campaign’s president an opportunity to display his knowledge of the situation:

Says Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which opposes open-carry laws: “We don’t want more people carrying guns either openly or concealed because the more guns you have in a situation, the more likely you are to get gun violence.” [Emphasis added]

The following series examines various government datasets to test Helmke’s “more guns, more violence” theory.

More

Globle Whining Roundup Tuesday, Feb 17 2009 

Back them into a corner with the facts, and they tend to get vicious. Here we have the left getting clobbered with the fact that global warming is bullshit and they stack the deck in their favor in order to make their case, and still fuck it up.

Travesty–Rep. Inslee’s behavior at Energy & Commerce hearing

I just watched the Energy & Commerce Subcommittee hearing on “The Climate Crisis: National Security, Public Health, and Economic Threats.”

Committee rules allow the minority one-third of the witnesses. Originally, there were to be four majority witnesses, which works out to only one minority witness, or one-fourth (because two witnesses would equal two-fifths–slightly more than one-third). However, when Chairman Markey learned that Dr. Patrick Michaels of the Cato Institute was to be the minority witness, he added a 5th majority witness, Prof. Daniel Schragg of Harvard University. So the decks were stacked against Michaels 5 to 1.

More

Global whining in the news:

Travesty-Rep. Inslee’s Behavior at Committee Hearing
Marlo Lewis, Globalwarming.org, 12 February 2009

The Collapse of Climate Policy
Roger Pielke Jr., Prometheus, 7 February 2009

Obama’s Extreme team on Energy
Ben Lieberman, FoxNews.com, 6 February 2009

Video: Heartland Institute Exposes Fear Mongering
Heartland Institute, 5 February 2009

Carbon Collapse Threatens Green Dreams
Sarah Arnott, The Independent, 9 February 2009

Climate Change Paradox: New Wind Power Doesn’t Reduce Emissions
Anselm Walderman, De Spiegal, 10 February 2009

Energy Secretary Floats a Carbon Tax
AFP, 12 February 2009

Obamaramadingdong and Such. Tuesday, Feb 17 2009 

Here’s a roundup of the Obama nonsense around the web.

The Only Thing to Fear

by Bill O’Reilly

Fear is a great motivator. Back in 1958, one small nun controlled 60 unruly kids in the third grade class at St. Brigid’s School in Westbury, N.Y. We all learned to read and do math. We all memorized our prayers. Why? Fear. That good sister wielded a mean ruler.

In politics, fear also can get things done. President Bush used the fear of another terror attack to convince Americans to support the Patriot Act and an aggressive worldwide war against terrorism. The results were mixed, but Bush had little problem getting the money and consensus he needed.

More

Related:

Democrats, Health Care “Reform,” And Your “Duty To Die”

by Austin Hill

Welcome to the Era of Obama. You now have a duty to die.

I’m not saying that someday you will die (that’s a given).

And I’m not saying that you should be given the “right to die” – - the freedom to take your own life, or to direct your Doctor to put you out of your misery – - that’s something entirely different.

I’m saying that someday, if current trends continue, your United States Government will determine that you have a “duty,” an obligation, to die.

More

Related:

The Rhetorical President

by Janice Shaw Crouse

The use of language to persuade is a skill much admired since ancient times. Few people become leaders without the ability to move others to agree with their arguments. Rightly understood, rhetoric is only one of the tools of persuasion; the other two, logic and dialectic, are required to truly change peoples’ minds. During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama awed the media and voters alike with his rhetorical skills. He continues to awe as he uses rhetorical manipulation to sell the stimulus package to the American public.

More

Related:

Image Is Everything

by Lorie Byrd

If you’ve heard it once, you’ve probably heard it a hundred times – in politics, perception is reality. In the age of Obama, that is more true than ever. Facts don’t always matter so much in politics. It’s more about image.

“Peter Perfect” is a reality show my family watches from time to time. The star of the show, Peter Ishkans, goes into struggling small businesses and helps them create a new look and a new marketing strategy to hopefully set them on the track to success. Ishkans sums up the philosophy behind his approach at the beginning of each show – “If you change your image, you will change your life.” The same could be said of the political world on a broader scale. If you create a successful image, you can change a country. If that country is America, you can even change the world.

More

Porkobama Tuesday, Feb 17 2009 

On the porkulus bill. This is bad for America. In fact, it will make things much worse than they are. I ask all of you to hold Obama and his cronies in Congress accountable for this. It is their doing. If it succeeds, America will no longer be the same one you grew up with. It will be similar to Hugo Chavez’ Venezuela.

As I am sure you can tell, and at least 70% of America agrees, the so called ‘stimulus’ bill is a true porker. I can’t express my anger in the way I would like, you know, my id is trying to free itself. Psych folks should get that one.

If not: id.

Overstimulation

By Jon N. Hall

When Democrats campaigned to retake Congress in 2006, they ran on PAYGO.

PAYGO (pay-as-you-go) is a commitment to not expand the federal budget deficit. With PAYGO, spending for new programs would be “deficit-neutral,” as it would be offset by cuts elsewhere in the budget. Nancy Pelosi said she was committed to PAYGO and wanted PAYGO to be “the law of the land.”

Fiscal Year 2007 began October 1, 2006, when the Republicans were still the majority party. The federal budget deficit for FY 2007 was $162 billion. The Democrats have been in control of the budget for the last two fiscal years, and the deficit for FY 2009 is now estimated to hit $1.2 trillion. So, whatever happened to PAYGO? Unfortunately, PAYGO seems to be dead.

When the dimensions of the financial crisis became apparent in September 2008, pundits opined that the Democrats’ plans for universal health care and other new programs would need to be shelved; there just wasn’t any money for new spending.

But now the Democrat Congress tells America that the economy needs a “jolt,” a “jumpstart,” a stimulus bill entailing massive deficit spending. At a conference for House Democrats on February 5, President Obama mocked those who differed with him on the stimulus bill:

So then you get the argument, “Well, this is not a stimulus bill, this is a spending bill.” [Dramatic pause.] What do you think a stimulus is? That’s the whole point.

If mere deficit spending could produce an economic stimulus, then America should have been stimulated every year since 1930. The most generous accounting for the federal budget (the “unified budget”) shows that Congress produced 12 balanced budgets in 79 years. There were three immediately after World War II; four in the 1950s; FY 1969; and four during the recent bubble economy, FY 1998 through 2001. So during the last 40 years Congress has stimulated us for 90 percent of the time.[1]

More

Related:

Unstimulated

by Salena Zito

If you placed a bet during the presidential campaign season on whether Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid were serious about hitting the ground running when they took over Washington, you probably have extra change in your pocket.

Whether it is George Bush with Iraq or Obama with the economy, politicians always have a bias for action. Obama’s action today is economic recovery — on speed.

The rush by the White House and Congress to “fix” things has been mind-numbing. But can’t anyone pause long enough to make sure that what’s being signed into law really is the right thing?

More

Related:

The Stimulus: Yes We Can’t

by David R. Stokes

Addressing the Democratic Party faithful last week in Williamsburg, Virginia, President Barack Obama brought the house down with a now-famous bit of political sarcasm about the stimulus package. The bill is now ready for the president’s signature, having emerged from the congressional laws-and-sausages-making mill. The specialty is pork sausage, by the way.

During his remarks that night, Mr. Obama mocked some who have been characterizing the package as merely a “spending bill.” He asked, “What do you think a stimulus is? That’s the whole point.” Then as the audience burst into laughter and applause (one could almost hear a Ralph Kramden-like “Har Har Hardy Har Har”), he added, “No, seriously, that’s the point.”

Seriously? Really?

More

Related:

Billions and Billions and Billions… Oh My!

The massive government interference and spending bill known as the stimulus package has passed Congress and awaits President Obama’s signature. Throughout the legislative process, it was disheartening to see just how much was spent on earmarks. Remember when the Democrats took control of the House, and Nancy Pelosi vowed to reform earmarks?

Now, during this debate, the arrogance of the left-wing Washington elite was taken to a new level. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) actually spoke before Congress and said that the American people don’t care about wasteful earmarks. President Obama stood before the American people at his primetime press conference and said the bill has NO pork at all. Come on! Let’s take a look at how wrong he really is…

More

Want to know where all that pork is going and how much?

http://www.stimuluswatch.org/

Very extensive site with all the details. Lists everything out in different ways.

This shit will make you gag. America is really going to suffer with this one. Your government – Providing hours of entertainment at the click of a mouse!

Here’s a tidbit: $17,500,000,000 is the most expensive, one of the least necessary and not even going to one of the 50 states. Puerto Rico is getting the lions share on one of its pet projects. Fucking sick.

Took a Weekend Tuesday, Feb 17 2009 

Took a weekend break.

I needed to chill and not get all worked up over politics for a bit. It helps keep the blood pressure on an even keel.

Well, enough of that shit. Back to the old grind stone.

Fairness Lies Friday, Feb 13 2009 

The socialists in this country are out to get talk radio. It isn’t enough that they have the MSM and the newspapers.

Their target? Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, and Laura Ingraham. Mostly Rush at the moment, but the other three are well aware that they are also targets.

These three will fight back, unlike Bush. They’ll fight to win. Between the thee of them, there are millions of listeners that are conservative and informed.

You douche nozzles on the left that think you’ll win this one, are in for a rude awakening.

I’m still stocking up on ammo. Keep it up and I might have to find a hill and start thinning the herd. (That’s a joke, in case you’re a moron).

Alinsky-ites at the Gates of Talk Radio
By Kyle-Anne Shiver

“You can’t just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done.”
- President Barack Obama to Republican Lawmakers

Fellow citizens, if you like what ACORN did to the home mortgage industry, then you’re going to just plum love what the Democrats have in mind for talk radio.  For the past few years, hardly a week goes without some Democratic Party Senator or Representative throwing out the term, “Fairness Doctrine.”  Hardly a month passes without a Democrat spurning the so-called “dangers” of conservative talk radio, often invoking Rush Limbaugh by name.

Why, if I didn’t know better, I might think there’s a vast left-wing conspiracy afoot, an evil conspiracy to storm the gates of talk radio.

Actually, that might not be a far stretch.  After extensive studies of Alinsky and how and where his infamous revolutionary tactics are currently at play within the once-august Democratic Party, I must conclude that this is precisely the case.

Alinsky-ites are indeed at the gates of talk radio.

Get ready to rumble if you want to save your right to free speech.

More

Actions and Reactions Thursday, Feb 12 2009 

On the major screw up that the Obamassiah did on his first few days in office. Actions always have reactions. In this case, it’s a doozy.

Obama’s outrageous oversight

President Obama clearly didn’t do his homework before ordering the suspension of military tribunals to try terrorist suspects. We have learned that even his own legal counsel admitted that Mr. Obama erred in discussing details about terrorism with families of victims last week, and that the administration was ignorant of a key point that terrorists exploit to their advantage. In his rush to fulfill a campaign promise to his more fervid anti-war supporters, the president’s legal oversights risk the disclosure of some highly classified information to terrorists.

Debra Burlingame, sister of Charles Burlingame III, the pilot of American Airlines Flight 77 that was flown into the Pentagon on 9/11, was present at last Friday’s White House meeting of families of terrorism victims. Her impression was that President Obama was saying the right words in general, but when it came to specifics he was uncertain, uninformed, and sometimes just plain mistaken. Ms. Burlingame is an attorney who has followed closely the legal aspects of the terrorism cases, and her detailed, probing questions were met with stammers, stares, and statements that betrayed an understanding of the law that was, she said, “flat out wrong.”

More

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.