Hope and Change my Shorts Tuesday, Dec 2 2008 

Funny how the libtard media was in cahoots with the Obamanable Blowman prior to the election. Can’t wait to hear the silence after the inauguration of a usurper.

From Victor Davis Hanson:

Turning on a dime. There is such a thing as divine Nemesis, even though the god seems to sleep for long periods. The media violated all the classical cannons of fairness and objectivity in this presidential campaign. Now they are in a dilemma, since most of their long-voiced objections about Bush won’t be operative any more—on matters of taxes, Guantánamo, the bail-outs, FISA, the Patriot Act, Iraq, guns, abortion, capital punishment—inasmuch as Obama suddenly won’t be hoping and changing much of anything, but often leaving things on these issues as they are, while turning management over to the tentacles of the Clinton octopus. The media, in Animal Farm fashion, will have to do a ‘that was then, this is now’ turnabout, as they dream of reasons why Gitmo is not that bad, or why keeping the Bush tax cuts for a bit will stimulate the economy, or why wiretapping on suspected terrorists, on reflection, isn’t really that subversive. And as they reinvent the once evil administration policies, and the formerly Hillary hacks into inspired Obama ideas and experienced and professional Obama appointments, few will believe them. Done, over with—the media has lost credibility and will have to start over from square one. And all that was a much needed development. (PS—after the India nightmare, note the Obama reaction to dismantling the FISA accords, Patriot Act, Guantánamo, and withdrawing from Iraq, as the campaign rhetoric of Bush shredding the Constitution morphs into something like ‘the public will turn on a dime and blame us for criminal laxity if anything like 9/11 happens on our watch.’)

More

Guantanamo and Terrorist Health Care Tuesday, Dec 2 2008 

What in the fuck are they thinking? Our own veterans can’t get the help they need, yet pisslamist assholes at Guantanamo Bay receive health care beyond the wildest dreams of our own combat veterans. You assholes on the left that have been screaming about how Guantanamo is the hell hole of torture prisons run by the U.S. should go take a flying leap. Preferably with a noose around your fucking necks.

“If Obama wants his detention of Islamic terrorists to be dramatically different from Bush’s Guantanamo, my suggestion is that he cut off — so to speak — the expensive prosthetic limb procedures now being granted the detained terrorists. Far from being sodomized and tortured by U.S. forces — as Obama’s base has wailed for the past seven years — the innocent scholars and philanthropists being held at Guantanamo have been given expensive, high-tech medical procedures at taxpayer expense. If we’re not careful, multitudes of Muslims will be going to fight Americans in Afghanistan just so they can go to Guantanamo and get proper treatment for attention deficit disorder and erectile dysfunction. After being captured fighting with Taliban forces against Americans in 2001, Abdullah Massoud was sent to Guantanamo, where the one-legged terrorist was fitted with a special prosthetic leg, at a cost of $50,000-$75,000 to the U.S. taxpayer. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, Massoud would now be able to park his car bomb in a handicapped parking space! No, you didn’t read that wrong, because the VA won’t pay for your new glasses. I said $75,000. I would have gone with hanging at sunrise, but what do I know? Upon his release in March 2004, Massoud hippity-hopped back to Afghanistan and quickly resumed his war against the U.S. Aided by his new artificial leg, just months later, in October 2004, Massoud masterminded the kidnapping of two Chinese engineers in Pakistan working on the Gomal Zam Dam project. This proved, to me at least, that people with disabilities can do anything they put their minds to. Way to go, you plucky extremist! Massoud said he had nothing against the Chinese but wanted to embarrass Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf for cooperating with the Americans. You know, the Americans who had just footed — you should pardon the expression — a $75,000 bill for his prosthetic leg.” –columnist Ann Coulter

FAITH AND FAMILY Tuesday, Dec 2 2008 

I blogged about this earlier. It seems that some of the morons that call themselves Christians, but consistently vote against their religion, are starting to wake up to reality. The most pro-abortion candidate in history was ushered into the job with the help of idiots like Melinda Hennenberger. You reap what you sow bitch.

FAITH AND FAMILY

“Writing at Slate, a Catholic, Melinda Hennenberger (who apparently voted for Obama), worries about the President-elect’s strong pro-abortion views — suddenly realizing that if he was serious about his promise to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, it might well mean either that staff at Catholic hospitals are forced to perform abortions against their will or (in her view, the more likely scenario) Catholic hospitals across the country will simply close their doors. Well, yes. Could it be that pro-life Obama supporters are suddenly realizing that pro-lifers — including Archbishop Charles Chaput and other prominent Catholic clergy — weren’t kidding when they called Barack Obama the most extreme pro-abortion politician ever in mainstream American politics? She ends her piece like this: ‘At the very moment when Obama and his party have won the trust of so many Catholics who favor at least some limits on abortion, I hope he does not prove them wrong. I hope he does not make a fool out of that nice Doug Kmiec, who led the pro-life charge on his behalf. I hope he does not spit on the rest of us — though I don’t take him for the spitting sort — on his way in the door. I hope that his appointment of Ellen Moran, formerly of EMILY’s List, as his communications director is followed by the appointment of some equally good Democrats who hold pro-life views.’ It’s not clear what in the substance of President-elect Obama’s voting record makes such hopes at all reasonable. And somehow, I doubt this was the kind of ‘hope’ Obama supporters had in mind when they voted for him.” –Carol Platt Liebau

Government, the Gipper, and Liberty Tuesday, Dec 2 2008 

Here’s a couple from the Patriot Post.

GOVERNMENT

“For years, using the powers of the Community Reinvestment Act and other regulatory powers, along with threats of legal action if the loan approval rates varied from the population profile, politicians have pressured banks and other lending institutions into lending to people they would not lend to otherwise. Yet, when all this blows up in our faces and the economy turns down, what is the answer? To have more economic decisions made by politicians, because they choose to say that ‘deregulation’ is the cause of our problems. Regardless of how much suffocating regulation may have been responsible for an economic debacle, politicians have learned that they can get away with it if they call it ‘deregulation.’ No matter what happens, for politicians it is ‘heads I win and tails you lose.’ If we keep listening to the politicians and their media allies, we are all going to keep losing, big time.” –Hoover Institute economist Thomas Sowell.

THE GIPPER

“You and I are told we must choose between a left or right, but I suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down. Up to man’s age-old dream–the maximum of individual freedom consistent with order — or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. Regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would sacrifice freedom for security have embarked on this downward path. Plutarch warned, ‘The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits.’ ” –Ronald Reagan

More

LIBERTY

“Congratulations, tolerance mau-mauers: Your shakedown of a Christian-targeted dating website worked. Homosexuals will no longer be denied the inalienable ‘right’ to hook up with same-sex partners on eHarmony. What a landmark triumph for social progress, eh? New Jersey plaintiff Eric McKinley can now crown himself the new Rosa Parks — heroically breaking down inhumane barriers to Internet matchmaking by forcing a law-abiding private company to provide services it was never created to provide. ‘Men seeking men’ has now been enshrined with ‘I have a dream’ as a civil rights rallying cry of the 21st century. Bully for you, Mr. McKinley. You bully. Neil Warren, eHarmony’s founder, is a gentle, grandfatherly businessman who launched his popular dating site to support heterosexual marriage. A ‘Focus on the Family’ author with a divinity degree, Warren encourages healthy, lasting unions between men and women of all faiths, mixed faiths or no faith at all. Don’t like what eHarmony sells? Go somewhere else. There are thousands upon thousands of dating sites on the Internet that cater to gays, lesbians, Jews, Muslims, Trekkies, runners, you name it. No matter. In the name of tolerance, McKinley refused to tolerate eHarmony’s right to operate a lawful business that didn’t give him what he wanted. He filed a discrimination complaint against eHarmony with the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights in 2005. To be clear: eHarmony never, ever refused to do business with anyone. The company broke no laws. Their great ‘sin’ was not providing a politically correct service that a publicity-seeking gay plaintiff demanded they provide.” –columnist Michelle Malkin

The fucking homosexual mafia must be stopped. I encourage everyone to find the lists that these assholes published with the names of those companies that supported Proposition 8 and go buy twice as much as you normally would. That will show the minority assholes that they have absolutely shit for economic power.

Fuck off.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.